React componentDidUpdate method won't fire on

2019-03-29 19:28发布

I want my component know if some library is already loaded. To know that from any context i connect it to the "library" reducer of my store to my component. I also pass it a configuration object this.props.dataObject from the parent where the component has been called. Like this:

class GoogleButton extends Component {
    render() {
        if (this.props.libraries.google) {
            return <a id='sharePost' className='google_icon'></a>
        } else {
            return null
        }
    }

    componentDidUpdate() {
        gapi.interactivepost.render('sharePost', this.props.dataObject)
    }
}

function mapStateToProps(state) {
    return { libraries: state.libraries }
}

export default connect(mapStateToProps)(GoogleButton)

The reducer that handles the libraries state is like this:

let newState = {...state}
newState[action.libraryName] = action.state
return newState 

When I change the library state componentDidUpdate works. The problem is when i change the prop inherited by the parent this.props.dataObject. In that case is where componentDidUpdate wont fire. If i remove the connect from the component it works as espected. I'm missing something here?

3条回答
smile是对你的礼貌
2楼-- · 2019-03-29 19:57

Most likely some of your props are mutated outside the component.
For example, you might be rendering your component like this:

class Parent extends Component {
  constructor() {
    super()
    this.state = { libraries: {} }
  }

  handleClick() {
    // MUTATION!
    this.state.libraries.google = true

    // Normally this forces to update component anyway,
    // but React Redux will assume you never mutate
    // for performance reasons.

    this.setState({ libraries: this.state.libraries })
  }

  render() {
    return (
      <div onClick={() => this.handleClick()}>
        <GoogleButton libraries={this.state.libraries} />
      </div>
    )
  }
}

Because Redux apps deal with immutable data, connect() uses shallow equality check for its props to avoid unnecessary re-renders. However, this won’t work if you use mutation in your app.

You have two options:

Don’t Mutate Anything

This is the best option. For example, instead of something like

  handleClick() {
    this.state.libraries.google = true
    this.setState({ libraries: this.state.libraries })
  }

you can write

  handleClick() {
    this.setState({
      libraries: {
        ...this.state.libraries,
        google: true
      }
    })
  }

This way we are creating a new object so connect() wouldn’t ignore the changed reference. (I’m using the object spread syntax in this snippet.)

Disable Performance Optimizations

A worse alternative is to completely disable performance optimizations made by connect(). Then your props would update even if you mutate them in the parent, but your app will be slower. To do this, replace

export default connect(mapStateToProps)(GoogleButton)

with

export default connect(mapStateToProps, null, null, { pure: false })(GoogleButton)

Don’t do this unless absolutely necessary.

查看更多
男人必须洒脱
3楼-- · 2019-03-29 20:03

i had same problem and i used object.assign for create new state but i use combineReducer and it cause multi level state ,in my case i pass whole state as props to component so shallow equality check can not detect my state change so componentDidUpdate didnot call,it is important to pass state in level it change when using combine reducer in my case i pass it like this

const MapStateToProps=(state)=>{
    return {
        reportConfig:state.ReportReducer
    }
};

and my state tree is like this

  {
  ReportReducer: {
    reportConfig: {
      reportDateFilter: 'this week',
      reportType: null,
      reportShopId: null,
      updateShop: true
    }
  }
}

and in my reducer and return it like this as ReportReducer

export default combineReducers({reportConfig});

and my root reducer is like this

const rootReducer =combineReducers({ReportReducer});

const store = createStore(rootReducer ,{},enhancer);
查看更多
何必那么认真
4楼-- · 2019-03-29 20:04

I solved it. I'm not 100% sure that this is accurate, but I will explain. If im wrong with something, please correct me.

I keep thinking about the shallow equality check that Dan said in his answer. The problem was there. I was passing down an object from the parent and the nested elements of that object were the ones that changed. The object remain the same. So with the shallow equality check that connect brings the component will never update.

My solution was in the parent use Object.assign({}, dataObject) when I pass down the prop so I make another different object. Now shallow equality check could compare it and determinate that the props have changed and there before update the component.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答