Tail recursion with Groovy

2019-03-29 06:23发布

I coded 3 factorial algorithms:

  1. First, I expect to fail by Stack Overflow. No problem.
  2. Second, I try tail recusive call, convert previous algorithm from recursive to iterative. It doesn't work but I don't understand why.
  3. Third, I use trampoline() method and works fine as I expect.

def factorial

factorial = { BigInteger n ->
    if (n == 1) return 1
    n * factorial(n - 1)
}
factorial(1000)  // Stack Overflow

factorial = { Integer n, BigInteger acc = 1 ->
    if (n == 1) return acc
    factorial(n - 1, n * acc)
}
factorial(1000)  // Stack Overflow, why???

factorial = { Integer n, BigInteger acc = 1 ->
     if (n == 1) return acc
     factorial.trampoline(n - 1, n * acc)
}.trampoline()
factorial(1000)  // It works

2条回答
疯言疯语
2楼-- · 2019-03-29 06:57

Starting with version 2.3 Groovy supports tail recursion with the @TailRecursive annotation for methods: http://java.dzone.com/articles/groovy-goodness-more-efficient

查看更多
Bombasti
3楼-- · 2019-03-29 06:57

There is no tail recursion in Java, and hence there is none in Groovy either (without using something like trampoline() as you have shown)

The closest I have seen to this, is an AST transformation which cleverly wraps the return recursion into a while loop

Edit

You're right, Java (and hence Groovy) do support this sort of tail-call iteration, however, it doesn't seem to work with Closures...

This code however (using a method rather than a closure for the fact call):

public class Test {
  BigInteger fact( Integer a, BigInteger acc = 1 ) {
    if( a == 1 ) return acc
    fact( a - 1, a * acc )
  }
  static main( args ) {
    def t = new Test()
    println "${t.fact( 1000 )}"
  }
}

When saved as Test.groovy and executed with groovy Test.groovy runs, and prints the answer:

402387260077093773543702433923003985719374864210714632543799910429938512398629020592044208486969404800479988610197196058631666872994808558901323829669944590997424504087073759918823627727188732519779505950995276120874975462497043601418278094646496291056393887437886487337119181045825783647849977012476632889835955735432513185323958463075557409114262417474349347553428646576611667797396668820291207379143853719588249808126867838374559731746136085379534524221586593201928090878297308431392844403281231558611036976801357304216168747609675871348312025478589320767169132448426236131412508780208000261683151027341827977704784635868170164365024153691398281264810213092761244896359928705114964975419909342221566832572080821333186116811553615836546984046708975602900950537616475847728421889679646244945160765353408198901385442487984959953319101723355556602139450399736280750137837615307127761926849034352625200015888535147331611702103968175921510907788019393178114194545257223865541461062892187960223838971476088506276862967146674697562911234082439208160153780889893964518263243671616762179168909779911903754031274622289988005195444414282012187361745992642956581746628302955570299024324153181617210465832036786906117260158783520751516284225540265170483304226143974286933061690897968482590125458327168226458066526769958652682272807075781391858178889652208164348344825993266043367660176999612831860788386150279465955131156552036093988180612138558600301435694527224206344631797460594682573103790084024432438465657245014402821885252470935190620929023136493273497565513958720559654228749774011413346962715422845862377387538230483865688976461927383814900140767310446640259899490222221765904339901886018566526485061799702356193897017860040811889729918311021171229845901641921068884387121855646124960798722908519296819372388642614839657382291123125024186649353143970137428531926649875337218940694281434118520158014123344828015051399694290153483077644569099073152433278288269864602789864321139083506217095002597389863554277196742822248757586765752344220207573630569498825087968928162753848863396909959826280956121450994871701244516461260379029309120889086942028510640182154399457156805941872748998094254742173582401063677404595741785160829230135358081840096996372524230560855903700624271243416909004153690105933983835777939410970027753472000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

As a guess, I would say that the JVM does not know how to optimise closures (like it does with methods), so this tail call does not get optimised out in the bytecode before it is executed

查看更多
登录 后发表回答