The parent process fails with errno=12(Out of memory) when it tries to fork a child. The parent process runs on Linux 3.0 kernel - SLES 11. At the point of forking the child, the parent process has already used up around 70% of the RAM(180GB/256GB). Is there any workaround for this problem?
The application is written in C++, compiled with g++ 4.6.3.
fork
-ing requires resources, since it is copy-on-writing the writable pages of the process. Read again the fork(2) man page.You could at least provide a huge temporary swap file. You could create (on some file system with enough space) a huge file
$SWAPFILE
withOtherwise, you could for instance design your program differently, e.g.
mmap
-ing some big file (andmunmap
-ing it just before the fork, andmmap
-ing it again after), or more simply starting at the beginning of your program apopen
-ed shell, or ap2open
-ed one or making explicitly thepipe
-s to and from it (probably a multiplexing call à lapoll
would also be useful), and later issue commands to it.Maybe we could help more if we had an idea of what your program is doing, why does it consume so much memory, and why and what is it forking...
Read Advanced Linux Programming for more.
PS.
If you
fork
just to rungdb
to show the backtrace, consider simpler alternatives like recent GCC's libbacktrace or Wolf's libbacktrace...Maybe virtual memory over commit is prevented in your system.
If it is prevented, then the virtual memory can not be bigger than sizeof physical RAM + swap. If it is allowed, then virtual memory can be bigger than RAM+swap.
When your process forks, your processes (parent and child) would have 2*180GB of virtual memory (that is too much if you don't have swap).
So, allow over commit by this way:
It should help, if child process execves immediately, or frees allocated memory before the parent writes too much to own memory. So, be careful, out of memory killer may act if both processes keep using all the memory.
man page of proc(5) says:
More information here: Overcommit Memory in SLES