OK, so here is the problem. Its not even as crazy as the guy who wants to map m:n with different column counts in his PKs.
No matter what I do or where I look there seems to be no method chain that will result in a successful mapping of this.
I have tried doubling up on the Parent and Child columns, eg ParentColumn("").ParentColumn("").ChildColumn("").ChildColumn("") - didnt' think it would work and I was right.
Tried just using ForeignKeyConstraintNames no luck. Still FNH is mapping one side to a single key.
problem domain http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/349e4acfe3.png
public partial class M2M2ParentAMap : ClassMap<M2M2ParentA>
{
public M2M2ParentAMap()
{
Table("`M2M2ParentA`");
Schema("`dbo`");
CompositeId().KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentAId1, "`M2M2ParentAId1`" ).KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentAId2, "`M2M2ParentAId2`" );
HasManyToMany(x => x.M2M2ParentB).Schema("`dbo`")
.ForeignKeyConstraintNames("FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentA", "FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentB");
}
}
public partial class M2M2ParentBMap : ClassMap<M2M2ParentB>
{
public M2M2ParentBMap()
{
Table("`M2M2ParentB`");
Schema("`dbo`");
CompositeId().KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentBId1, "`M2M2ParentBId1`" ).KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentBId2, "`M2M2ParentBId2`" );
HasManyToMany(x => x.M2M2ParentA)
.Schema("`dbo`").ForeignKeyConstraintNames("FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentB", "FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentA");
}
}
public partial class M2M2LinkMap : ClassMap<M2M2Link>
{
public M2M2LinkMap()
{
Table("`M2M2Link`");
Schema("`dbo`");
CompositeId()
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentA_Id1, "`M2M2ParentA_Id1`" )
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentA_Id2, "`M2M2ParentA_Id2`" )
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentB_Id1, "`M2M2ParentB_Id1`" )
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentB_Id2, "`M2M2ParentB_Id2`" );
References(x => x.M2M2ParentA).Columns("`M2M2ParentA_Id1`","`M2M2ParentA_Id2`").Cascade.All();
References(x => x.M2M2ParentB).Columns("`M2M2ParentB_Id1`","`M2M2ParentB_Id2`").Cascade.All();
}
}
ERROR:
Foreign key (FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentB:M2M2ParentAToM2M2ParentB [M2M2ParentB_id])) must have same number of columns as the referenced primary key (M2M2ParentB [M2M2ParentBId1, M2M2ParentBId2])
AND
public partial class M2M2ParentAMap : ClassMap<M2M2ParentA>
{
public M2M2ParentAMap()
{
Table("`M2M2ParentA`");
Schema("`dbo`");
CompositeId()
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentAId1, "`M2M2ParentAId1`" )
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentAId2, "`M2M2ParentAId2`" );
HasManyToMany(x => x.M2M2ParentB)
.Schema("`dbo`")
.Table("`M2M2Link`")
.ParentKeyColumn("`M2M2ParentA_Id1`")
.ParentKeyColumn("`M2M2ParentA_Id2`")
.ChildKeyColumn("`M2M2ParentB_Id1`")
.ChildKeyColumn("`M2M2ParentB_Id2`");
}
}
public partial class M2M2ParentBMap : ClassMap<M2M2ParentB>
{
public M2M2ParentBMap()
{
Table("`M2M2ParentB`");
Schema("`dbo`");
CompositeId()
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentBId1, "`M2M2ParentBId1`" )
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentBId2, "`M2M2ParentBId2`" );
HasManyToMany(x => x.M2M2ParentA)
.Schema("`dbo`")
.Table("`M2M2Link`")
.ParentKeyColumn("`M2M2ParentB_Id1`")
.ParentKeyColumn("`M2M2ParentB_Id2`")
.ChildKeyColumn("`M2M2ParentA_Id1`")
.ChildKeyColumn("`M2M2ParentA_Id2`");
}
}
public partial class M2M2LinkMap : ClassMap<M2M2Link>
{
public M2M2LinkMap()
{
Table("`M2M2Link`");
Schema("`dbo`");
CompositeId()
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentA_Id1, "`M2M2ParentA_Id1`" )
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentA_Id2, "`M2M2ParentA_Id2`" )
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentB_Id1, "`M2M2ParentB_Id1`" )
.KeyProperty( x => x.M2M2ParentB_Id2, "`M2M2ParentB_Id2`" );
References(x => x.M2M2ParentA)
.Columns("`M2M2ParentA_Id1`","`M2M2ParentA_Id2`").Cascade.All();
References(x => x.M2M2ParentB)
.Columns("`M2M2ParentB_Id1`","`M2M2ParentB_Id2`").Cascade.All();
}
}
ERROR:
Foreign key (FKAB0E07EA57E45AB6:M2M2Link [M2M2ParentB_Id2])) must have same number of columns as the referenced primary key (M2M2ParentB [M2M2ParentBId1, M2M2ParentBId2])
DDL
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[M2M2ParentA] ( [M2M2ParentAId1] [int] NOT NULL,
[M2M2ParentAId2] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_M2M2ParentA] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [M2M2ParentAId1] ASC, [M2M2ParentAId2] ASC ) )
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[M2M2ParentB] ( [M2M2ParentBId1] [int] NOT NULL,
[M2M2ParentBId2] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_M2M2ParentB] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [M2M2ParentBId1] ASC, [M2M2ParentBId2] ASC ) )
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[M2M2Link] ( [M2M2ParentA_Id1] [int] NOT NULL,
[M2M2ParentA_Id2] [int] NOT NULL,
[M2M2ParentB_Id1] [int] NOT NULL,
[M2M2ParentB_Id2] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_M2M2Link] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [M2M2ParentA_Id1] ASC, [M2M2ParentA_Id2] ASC, [M2M2ParentB_Id1] ASC, [M2M2ParentB_Id2] ASC ) )
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[M2M2Link]
WITH CHECK
ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentA] FOREIGN KEY ( [M2M2ParentA_Id1], [M2M2ParentA_Id2] ) REFERENCES [dbo].[M2M2ParentA] ( [M2M2ParentAId1],
[M2M2ParentAId2] )
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[M2M2Link]
CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentA]
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[M2M2Link]
WITH CHECK
ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentB] FOREIGN KEY ( [M2M2ParentB_Id1], [M2M2ParentB_Id2] ) REFERENCES [dbo].[M2M2ParentB] ( [M2M2ParentBId1],
[M2M2ParentBId2] )
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[M2M2Link]
CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_M2M2Link_M2M2ParentB]
Update: I have tried creating a custom key type but was not successful.
Your challenge, if you choose to accept it:
Present code for the best working fluent mapping using this table structure, likely using a custom key type, and the bounty is yours.
Anyone?
If FluentNHibernate is currently unable to map this, then you can map it with a hbm.xml file.
I also used a component for the composite id of both classes. This makes the identity separate from the entity, allowing
session.Get<M2M2ParentA>( new M2M2Id( 1, 2 ))
. See this answer for a discussion of the 3 ways to represent composite-id (it is the same for NHibernate and Hibernate).And my version of your classes.
The short answer to your question is that Fluent can't handle that situation yet, and you should map it with a .hbm.xml file.
The long answer is that Fluent CAN actually do it if the composite keys of your 2 parent tables are instead made up of foreign keys to 4 separate grandparent tables (GPA1,GPA2,GPB1,GPB2 - in the example below). In that case, the mapping could look something like this... (but it IS a bit hackey)
There should be HasMany<> relationships in each of those mapping classes, but I got lazy. If you go the route of including a .hbm.xml file, I'd recommend using the .ExportTo("c:\") function when you configure your ISessionFactory and you can just edit the hbm file that fluent puts out. It's a great starting point.
HTH, -Danno