I'm trying to use ASTs with ANTLR4, with this files:
Builder.java
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.ANTLRInputStream;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.CharStream;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.CommonTokenStream;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.TokenStream;
public class Builder
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
CharStream input = new ANTLRInputStream("ON M1==2 && M3 == 5 && (M2 > 1 || M5 <= 5.0) "
+ "DO P5:42 P4:10");
ExprLexer lexer = new ExprLexer(input);
TokenStream tokens = new CommonTokenStream(lexer);
ExprParser parser = new ExprParser(tokens);
parser.addParseListener(new ExprTestListener());
ExprParser.ExpressionContext uu = parser.expression();
}
}
ExprTestListener:
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.ParserRuleContext;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.Token;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.TerminalNode;
import org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.ErrorNode;
public class ExprTestListener extends ExprBaseListener {
@Override public void enterExpression(ExprParser.ExpressionContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void exitExpression(ExprParser.ExpressionContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void enterActionexpr(ExprParser.ActionexprContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void exitActionexpr(ExprParser.ActionexprContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void enterCondexpr(ExprParser.CondexprContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void exitCondexpr(ExprParser.CondexprContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void enterCond(ExprParser.CondContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void exitCond(ExprParser.CondContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void enterEveryRule(ParserRuleContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void exitEveryRule(ParserRuleContext ctx)
{
System.out.println(ctx);
}
@Override public void visitTerminal(TerminalNode node)
{
}
@Override public void visitErrorNode(ErrorNode node)
{
}
}
Expr.g:
grammar Expr;
options
{
// antlr will generate java lexer and parser
language = Java;
}
WS : [ \t\r\n]+ -> skip ;
OP : '&&' | '||';
COMP : '==' | '<' | '>' | '<=' | '>=' | '!=';
fragment INT : [0-9]+;
REAL : INT '.' INT | INT;
ACTION : 'P' INT ':' INT;
MEASURE : 'M' INT;
// ***************** parser rules:
cond : MEASURE COMP REAL;
condexpr : '(' condexpr ')' | cond OP condexpr | cond;
actionexpr : ACTION actionexpr | ACTION;
expression : 'ON' condexpr 'DO' actionexpr;
I have this output:
[]
[]
[29]
[29]
[16 29]
[16 29]
[16 29]
[16 29]
[18 29]
[18 29]
[16 18 29]
[16 18 29]
[16 18 29]
[16 18 29]
[18 18 29]
[18 18 29]
[13 18 18 29]
[13 18 18 29]
[16 13 18 18 29]
[16 13 18 18 29]
[16 13 18 18 29]
[16 13 18 18 29]
[18 13 18 18 29]
[18 13 18 18 29]
[20 18 13 18 18 29]
[20 18 13 18 18 29]
[20 18 13 18 18 29]
[20 18 13 18 18 29]
[18 13 18 18 29]
[18 13 18 18 29]
[13 18 18 29]
[13 18 18 29]
[18 18 29]
[18 18 29]
[18 29]
[18 29]
[29]
[29]
[31]
[31]
[24 31]
[24 31]
[24 31]
[24 31]
[31]
[31]
[]
[]
I find it hard to understand visitors with ANTLR4.
I have tree goals:
- Get collect INTs of MEASUREs and ACTIONs (in two different sets)
- Replace some OPs (for example != by <>)
- Get the condexpr (the top item) string with OPs remplaced (se my previous point)
First I'll explain what you have observed above:
First and foremost, please read the documentation for the methods you call. The
Parser.addParseListener
documentation includes the following note:The implementation of
toString()
for theParserRuleContext
class simply prints the rule invocation stack at the time the context was created. You are printing this once when the listener enters a rule, and once when it exits. Foractionexpr
,cond
, andcondexpr
you print it again, resulting in a total of 4 identical output lines for each of those contexts.Now some notes on your goals:
enterCond
andexitCond
, theMEASURE
text is available by callingctx.MEASURE().getText()
.enterActionexpr
andexitActionexpr
, theACTION
text is available by callingctx.ACTION().getText()
.COND
token by creating a newTerminalNodeImpl
andCommonToken
for the updated token, and assigning it to the correct index in the fieldCondContext.children
using either a visitor or a listener.A tree label you could use, to set the context of the parse and then walks the leaves of the observed graph with a visitor class and trigger methods in order to create actions from the expressions in the language source code. Thus, at the initial visitation, the listener does not process the actual visitor pattern. The actual visitor pattern and the processing through visitation is done by the methods of the expressionbase listener class extension.
The listener identifies the expression:
The expression rule gets a name label:
The expression walker is implemented:
The main file then walks with the walker:
intermezzo: before applying the walker visitation pattern one may imagine tree segment optimisation- or processing patterns. The parsed tree could be handled here as a seperate induction of the source code tree. This approach enables more complicated code- and tree processing patterns.