Having a problem with parsing Snort logs using the pyparsing module.
The problem is with separating the Snort log (which has multiline entries, separated by a blank line) and getting pyparsing to parse each entry as a whole chunk, rather than read in line by line and expecting the grammar to work with each line (obviously, it does not.)
I have tried converting each chunk to a temporary string, stripping out the newlines inside each chunk, but it refuses to process correctly. I may be wholly on the wrong track, but I don't think so (a similar form works perfectly for syslog-type logs, but those are one-line entries and so lend themselves to your basic file iterator / line processing)
Here's a sample of the log and the code I have so far:
[**] [1:486:4] ICMP Destination Unreachable Communication with Destination Host is Administratively Prohibited [**]
[Classification: Misc activity] [Priority: 3]
08/03-07:30:02.233350 172.143.241.86 -> 63.44.2.33
ICMP TTL:61 TOS:0xC0 ID:49461 IpLen:20 DgmLen:88
Type:3 Code:10 DESTINATION UNREACHABLE: ADMINISTRATIVELY PROHIBITED HOST FILTERED
** ORIGINAL DATAGRAM DUMP:
63.44.2.33:41235 -> 172.143.241.86:4949
TCP TTL:61 TOS:0x0 ID:36212 IpLen:20 DgmLen:60 DF
Seq: 0xF74E606
(32 more bytes of original packet)
** END OF DUMP
[**] ...more like this [**]
And the updated code:
def snort_parse(logfile):
header = Suppress("[**] [") + Combine(integer + ":" + integer + ":" + integer) + Suppress("]") + Regex(".*") + Suppress("[**]")
cls = Optional(Suppress("[Classification:") + Regex(".*") + Suppress("]"))
pri = Suppress("[Priority:") + integer + Suppress("]")
date = integer + "/" + integer + "-" + integer + ":" + integer + "." + Suppress(integer)
src_ip = ip_addr + Suppress("->")
dest_ip = ip_addr
extra = Regex(".*")
bnf = header + cls + pri + date + src_ip + dest_ip + extra
def logreader(logfile):
chunk = []
with open(logfile) as snort_logfile:
for line in snort_logfile:
if line !='\n':
line = line[:-1]
chunk.append(line)
continue
else:
print chunk
yield " ".join(chunk)
chunk = []
string_to_parse = "".join(logreader(logfile).next())
fields = bnf.parseString(string_to_parse)
print fields
Any help, pointers, RTFMs, You're Doing It Wrongs, etc., greatly appreciated.
You have some regex unlearning to do, but hopefully this won't be too painful. The biggest culprit in your thinking is the use of this construct:
Each subparser within a pyparsing parser is pretty much standalone, and works sequentially through the incoming text. So the Regex term has no way to look ahead to the next expression to see where the
'*'
repetition should stop. In other words, the expressionRegex(".*")
is going to just read until the end of the line, since that is where".*"
stops without specifying multiline.In pyparsing, this concept is implemented using SkipTo. Here is how your header line is written:
Your ".*" problem gets resolved by changing it to:
Same thing for cls.
One last bug, your definition of date is short by one ':' + integer:
should be:
I think those changes will be sufficient to start parsing your log data.
Here are some other style suggestions:
You have a lot of repeated
Suppress("]")
expressions. I've started defining all my suppressable punctuation in a very compact and easy to maintain statement like this:(expand to add whatever other punctuation characters you like). Now I can use these characters by their symbolic names, and I find the resulting code a little easier to read.
You start off header with
header = Suppress("[**] [") + ...
. I never like seeing spaces embedded in literals this way, as it bypasses some of the parsing robustness pyparsing gives you with its automatic whitespace skipping. If for some reason the space between "[**]" and "[" was changed to use 2 or 3 spaces, or a tab, then your suppressed literal would fail. Combine this with the previous suggestion, and header would begin withI know this is generated text, so variation in this format is unlikely, but it plays better to pyparsing's strengths.
Once you have your fields parsed out, start assigning results names to different elements within your parser. This will make it a lot easier to get the data out afterward. For instance, change cls to:
Will allow you to access the classification data using
fields.classification
.Well, I don't know Snort or
pyparsing
, so apologies in advance if I say something stupid. I'm unclear as to whether the problem is withpyparsing
being unable to handle the entries, or with you being unable to send them topyparsing
in the right format. If the latter, why not do something like this?Of course, if you need to modify each chunk before sending it to
pyparsing
, you can do so beforeyield
ing it.yields