I currently am starting a new Webapp (running on tomcat 6) I have components using slf4j and components using commons logging I plan to use log4j 2.0 as log implementation due to several reasons (mainly for the appenders:SocketAppender and SyslogAppender but also because of the promoted config reloading without loss of log events)
Now my questions are: - To which interface do I program my new classes? loag4j or slf4j? or even commons logging?
What's the preferred way to deploy the jars? put them in my application war or do i put them into the tomcat libs?
what jars do I need to deploy? log4j (including slf4j and commons bindings), commons logging (slf4j-api-1.7.2.jar) and slf4j api (slf4j-api-1.7.2.jar)
Please note that I have not used Log4J 2.0, although I have used SLF4J with Log4J 1.2. With that being said, I would answer your questions as follows:
lib
directory. Otherwise, they will affect all web applications on that application server, not just yours. Furthermore, jars in the application server'slib
directory cannot be controlled by deploying webapps, but have to be managed manually.slf4j-api-1.7.2.jar
,log4j-to-slf4j-2.0-beta4.jar
,log4j-2.0-beta4.jar
andlog4j-core-2.0-beta4.jar
, along with any dependencies. I'm sure Maven will bring in the required dependencies if you are using that.I am using slf4j with log4j2 and using
if your app server has conflicting versions, you may need to override using some vendor specific classloader settings
e.g. in weblogic 12 c I have this in my weblogic.xml inside src/main/webapp/WEB-INF
If you're going to use SLF4J, program to that interface. It offers the most flexibility for underlying logging implementation. The point of slf4j is to be an interface that you can program to, so in the future if you decide to switch to, say, logback, you won't have to rewrite your code.
Put them in your WAR.
The only reason (imo) to put JARs in the Tomcat libs directory is if they need to load a native library. Since Java won't allow you to load the same native library from two different classloaders, you need to put then in a common location. But that doesn't apply here.
Some people think of the lib directory as a way to save space. That may have been valid when "server-class" machines had 1 GB of RAM, but it isn't any more. And avoiding
lib
means you avoid most of the hard-to-debug classloading issues.I'm assuming that you already have configuration for Log4J and/or are comfortable writing that configuration. If not, and all you care about is dealing with code that uses Log4J internally, there's
log4j-over-slf4j
, which will intercept Log4J calls. Then you need to pick a framework, such as Logback.(note: I originally added links to all of these packages, but don't have enough rep to post them. So here's a single link to the Maven repository with all of the SLF4J packages highlighted)