int a, b, c;
Constructor()
{
a = 5;
b = 10;
c = 15;
//do stuff
}
Constructor(int x, int y)
{
a = x;
b = y;
c = 15;
//do stuff
}
Constructor(int x, int y, int z)
{
a = x;
b = y;
c = z;
//do stuff
}
To prevent duplication of "stuff" and a few assignments, I tried out something like:
int a, b, c;
Constructor(): this(5, 10, 15)
{
}
Constructor(int x, int y): this(x, y, 15)
{
}
Constructor(int x, int y, int z)
{
a = x;
b = y;
c = z;
//do stuff
}
This works for what I want to do, but sometimes I need to use some lengthy code to create new objects or do some calculations:
int a, b, c;
Constructor(): this(new Something(new AnotherThing(param1, param2, param3),
10, 15).CollectionOfStuff.Count, new SomethingElse("some string", "another
string").GetValue(), (int)Math.Floor(533 / 39.384))
{
}
Constructor(int x, int y): this(x, y, (int)Math.Floor(533 / 39.384))
{
}
Constructor(int x, int y, int z)
{
a = x;
b = y;
c = z;
//do stuff
}
This code is pretty much the same as before, only the parameters that are being passed aren't very readable. I would prefer doing something like:
int a, b, c;
Constructor(): this(x, y, z) //compile error, variables do not exist in context
{
AnotherThing at = new AnotherThing(param1, param2, param3);
Something st = new Something(aThing, 10, 15)
SomethingElse ste = new SomethingElse("some string", "another string");
int x = thing.CollectionOfStuff.Count;
int y = ste.GetValue();
int z = (int)Math.Floor(533 / 39.384);
//In Java, I think you can call this(x, y, z) at this point.
this(x, y, z); //compile error, method name expected
}
Constructor(int x, int y): this(x, y, z) //compile error
{
int z = (int)Math.Floor(533 / 39.384);
}
Constructor(int x, int y, int z)
{
a = x;
b = y;
c = z;
//do stuff
}
Basically I'm building the parameters within the constructor body. Then I'm trying to pass those built parameters to another constructor. I think I remember being able to use the "this" and "super" keywords to call constructors while inside the body of another constructor when coding in Java. It doesn't seem possible in C#.
Is there a way to do this easily? Did I do something incorrectly? If this is not possible, should I just stick with the unreadable code?
I guess I could always cut the duplicated code into another method completely outside the constructors. Then each constructor would just do its own thing and call the code shared by the other constructors.
As an alternative to calling an initialization method from all constructors (which prevents you from using
readonly
fields) or factory methods (which introduce additional complexity when you have derived classes), you can use a parameter object:You can do
However if you need to do some fancy logic depending on the parameters, I would use a factory pattern:
Although you don't need a factory pattern, it definitely makes your constructor logic readable.