Is it conventional to use Marionette.ItemView
for view classes that do not have a specific model
property associated with them?
As Marionette.View
is not meant to be used directly, it seems like an ItemView
makes sense as a view class with convenient defaults and bindings.
Or, should one just resort to using Backbone.View
? If so, is there a way to hook Backbone.View
into Marionette's evented and garbage-collected architecture?
Thank you for clarification!
I just found out you can use a templateHelper for this - just chuck this in your ItemView declaration:
And then in your template:
And then when you initialise the view:
I would be interested in your thoughts on this Derick?
ItemView can be used without a model. I do this quite regularly.
If you need to specify data for an ItemView, but not have that data in a Backbone.Model, you need to override the
serializeData
method:the base Marionette.View isnt' meant to be used directly because it doesn't provide a render function on it's own. That doesn't mean you can't use it to create your own base view types, though. You could, for example, build a view type for your application that deals with rendering google maps or a third party widget or something else that doesn't need the general Backbone.Model based rendering that ItemView has in it.