I have this piece of code:
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses, FunctionalDependencies, KindSignatures, GADTs, FlexibleInstances, FlexibleContexts #-}
class Monad m => Effect p e r m | p e m -> r where
fin :: p e m -> e -> m r
data ErrorEff :: * -> (* -> *) -> * where
CatchError :: (e -> m a) -> ErrorEff ((e -> m a) -> m a) m
instance Monad m => Effect ErrorEff ((e -> m a) -> m a) a m where
fin (CatchError h) = \f -> f h
This doesn't compile, with this type error in the last line:
Could not deduce (a1 ~ a)
from the context (Monad m)
[...]
or from (((e -> m a) -> m a) ~ ((e1 -> m a1) -> m a1))
[...]
If I change m
to []
it compiles fine, so apparently GHC thinks that m
is not injective. (Although it doesn't warn about injectivity like it does with type families.)
My version of GHC is 7.2.1.
Edit: If I change (e -> m a)
to e
it works, if I change it to m a
it doesn't, and neither for (m a -> e)
.
It's not exactly a bug, but it is a long story...
The Story
In 7.0 there used to be a coercion constructor called
right
which worked like this:That is, if
g
is a coercion betweenf a
andf b
, thenright g
is a coercion betweena
andb
. This is only sound iff
is guaranteed to be injective: otherwise we might legitimately have, say,f Int ~ f Char
and then we would be able to concludeInt ~ Char
, which would be Bad.But of course, type synonyms and type families are not necessarily injective; for example:
So how is this guarantee possible? Well, this is precisely the reason why partial applications of type synonyms and type families are not allowed. Partial applications of type synonyms and type families may not be injective, but saturated applications (even ones which result in a higher kind) always are.
Of course, the restriction on partial applications is annoying. So in 7.2, in an attempt to move in the direction of allowing partial application (and because it simplifies the theory and implementation of the coercion language), the
right
constructor was replaced by a constructornth
, with the accompanying ruleThat is,
nth
only applies to a coerciong
which is between two types which are known to be saturated applications of a type constructorT
. In theory, this allows for partial applications of type synonyms and families, because we cannot decompose equalities until we know that they are between applications of a (necessarily injective) type constructor. In particular,nth
does not apply to a coercionf a ~ f b
becausef
is a type variable, not a type constructor.It was thought at the time of the change that no one would really notice, but obviously this was wrong!
Interestingly, the Olegian trick outlined in the haskell-cafe message from Daniel Schüssler shows that the implementation of type families was not changed accordingly! The problem is that a definition like
should not be allowed if
f
could be non-injective; in that case the definition does not even make sense.Next Steps
I think the right thing to do is to reinstate
right
(or something equivalent), since people clearly want it! Hopefully this will be done soon.In the meantime, it would still be really cool to allow partially applied type synonyms and families. It seems the Right Way (tm) to do that would be to track injectivity in the kind system: that is, each arrow kind would be annotated with its injectivity. This way when encountering an equality
f a ~ f b
we could look at the kind off
to determine whether it is safe to decompose it into the equalitya ~ b
. Not coincidentally, I am currently trying to work out the design of such a system. =)I'm not sure about the cause, but I reduced your testcase to:
which compiles in GHC 7.0.3 but not 7.3.20111021.
This is definitely a compiler bug.
It compiles after changing:
And the function "fin" can be recovered with record syntax: