C++ float to int

2019-03-11 06:14发布

Maybe, it's very simple question but I couldn't get the answer. I've been searching quite a while ( now Google think that I'm sending automated queries http://twitter.com/michaelsync/status/17177278608 ) ..

int n = 4.35 *100;
cout << n;

Why does the output become "434" instead of "435"? 4.35 * 100 = 435 which is a integer value and this should be assignable to the integer variable "n", right?

OR Does the C++ compiler cast 4.35 to integer before multiplying? I think it won't. Why does the compiler automatically change 4.35 to 4.34 which is still a float??

Thanks.

标签: c++
5条回答
虎瘦雄心在
2楼-- · 2019-03-11 06:50

If you run this statement:

cout << 4.35

Dollars to donuts you get something approximately like 4.3499998821 because 4.35 isn't exactly representable in a float.

When the compiler casts a float to an int it truncates.

To get the behavior your expect, try:

int n = floor((4.35 * 100.0) + 0.5);

(The trickyness with floor is because C++ doesn't have a native round() function)

查看更多
聊天终结者
3楼-- · 2019-03-11 07:07

Floating point numbers don't work that way. Many (most, technically an infinite number of...) values cannot be stored or manipulated precisely as floating point. 4.35 would seem to be one of them. It's getting stored as something that's actually below 4.35, hence your result.

查看更多
Melony?
4楼-- · 2019-03-11 07:10

When a float is converted to an int the fractional part is truncated, the conversion doesn't take the nearest int to the float in value.

4.35 can't be exactly represented as a float, the nearest representable number is (we can deduce) very slightly less that 4.35, i.e. 4.34999... , so when multiplied by 100 you get 434.999...

If you want to convert a positive float to the nearest int you should add 0.5 before converting to int.

E.g.

int n = (4.35 * 100) + 0.5;
cout << n;
查看更多
霸刀☆藐视天下
5楼-- · 2019-03-11 07:13

What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic

That's really just a starting point, sadly, as then languages introduce their own foibles as to when they do type conversions, etc. In this case you've merely created a situation where the constant 4.35 can't be represented precisely, and thus 4.35*100 is more like 434.9999999999, and the cast to int does trunc, not round.

查看更多
劳资没心,怎么记你
6楼-- · 2019-03-11 07:14

The internal representation of 4.35 ends up being 4.349999999 or similar. Multiplying by 100 shifts the decimal, and the .9999 is dropped off (truncated) when converting to int.

Edit: Was looking for the link Nick posted. :)

查看更多
登录 后发表回答