What PEP 8 guidelines do you ignore, and which one

Question

Over the years, the more Python I write, the more I find myself agreeing with most of the guidelines, though I consistently and intentionally break some for my own reasons.

I'd be curious to know what in PEP 8 (or other PEPs too maybe) people religiously stick to and why, and what people find inconvenient or inadequate.

In my case (and at work in general), there's only a handful of things we deviate from:

• Underscore separated lowercase names, I can see the point of it, as it will unfailingly be consistent, but we tend to use lowerCamelCase, even if it will occasionally introduce some inconsistencies (such as partially or mis-capitalized acronyms and following words, which are often down to spur-of-the-moment calls). Mostly because the near totality of the APIs we routinely use use camelCase (some upper, some lower), and because for some reason I find it easier to read, and tend to reserve underscores as separation tokens or prescribed mangling/obscuring.

• I still can't get myself to space things out the way the PEP prescribes inside objects. new and init I tend to leave right under the class with no blank lines as I always want to read them right there with the class name and args, methods that contribute to the same scope of functionality in the class (say init, get and set of the same attrib or set of attribs) I only single-space apart, and I like three spaces between classes, and two between methods I wouldn't mentally aggregate in the map of that object. This is, again, purely for the visual impact and readability of the code. I find that very compact contents inside flow control and this kind of spacing between methods and objects consistently leads my eye exactly where I want it to go on re-readings months after the code had been parked. It also responds well to folding in my editors of choice.

• Some things instead I stick to, that drive me nuts when I read otherwise written, is tabs instead of spaces (especially when some in-app editors we use don't really have tab replacement functionalities, contributing considerably to pollution in the code base at prototyping stage).

• Order of things such as imports, and what imports, globals etc. It really throws me off on files that have large amounts of imports when those are mixed up or out of order.

• Whitespaces in statements, especially when people use tabs AND try to align assignment ops across lines with different length in var names (and there seems to be no way to persuade those who do it that an excel looking piece of code is NOT neater ;) ).

• And spacing within a control block, particularly when I see apparently random spacing within the same flow control block, and then similar amounts of spacing used within the object for methods. I'm compelled to edit those before I can even start reading the damn thing.

So, those are mine, and the reasoning behind my "violations" of the PEP (some shared, some frowned upon by colleagues). I'd be very curious to read what other Pythonistas do and don't do in those regards.

Answer 1

I don't agree with this:

- Imports should usually be on separate lines, e.g.:

    Yes: import os
         import sys

    No:  import sys, os

I always write simple imports together. I don't see any advantage to writing them all on separate lines: all it does is add bloat to the top of each source file, and turn something concise and easy to type into something that's borderline boilerplate, eg. something that's so verbose it starts to be tempting to copy and paste from other files.

This is instantly readable and understandable:

import sys, os, time, gc, inspect, math, doctest

It's short, easy to skim, and easy to add to. I do use multiple import statements if there are too many on one line, of course, or if I need a from import.

I also do generally keep standard library imports separate from imports of my own modules and other libraries, which agrees with the concept of grouping PEP8 recommends.

Answer 2

My "admit violation" is about "if"

PEP8 says no multiple statement in one line, so for if we must do this :

if cond:
    actions
    ...

But when there only one action, I prefer all in one line, e.g. I prefer :

if a == 0: b = 0

than:

if a == 0:
     b = 0

Answer 3

PEP 8 says:

Yes:

x = 1
y = 2
long_variable = 3

No:

x             = 1
y             = 2
long_variable = 3

i usually follow it, but i sometimes use another variant, for the sake of better readability:

x =             1
y =             2
long_variable = 3

Answer 4

I use pylint, http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pylint, it is an excellent tool to try to keep your code clean and readable for you and other developers accessing your code.

I does not cover all topics you said, though, but it is very useful.

You can have reports like this one:

carlos@debian:~/src/fcl/cltools$ pylint numbertoletters.py
No config file found, using default configuration
************* Module numbertoletters
C:  1: Missing docstring
C: 56:es_numero: Missing docstring
C: 56:es_numero: Invalid name "s" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C: 56:es_numero: Invalid name "s" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C: 69:convertnumbertoletters: Empty docstring
C: 90:convertnumbertoletters: Operator not preceded by a space
    numero='%(numero)09d' % {'numero' : int(parte_entera)}
          ^
C: 92:convertnumbertoletters: Comma not followed by a space
    for i in [0,3,6]:
               ^^

W: 69:convertnumbertoletters: Unused argument 'languaje'
C:108:unidades: Empty docstring
C:108:unidades: Invalid name "x" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:108:unidades: Invalid name "x" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:112:unidades: Invalid name "u" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:118:teens: Empty docstring
C:118:teens: Invalid name "x" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:118:teens: Invalid name "x" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:122:teens: Invalid name "t" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:127:tens: Empty docstring
C:127:tens: Invalid name "x" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:127:tens: Invalid name "x" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:131:tens: Invalid name "t" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:137:tercia: Empty docstring
C:141:tercia: Operator not preceded by a space
    numero='%(numero)03d' % {'numero' : int(num)}
          ^
C:143:tercia: Invalid name "a" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:144:tercia: Invalid name "b" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:145:tercia: Invalid name "c" (should match [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
C:163:tercia: Operator not followed by a space
                resultado ='veinti '+unidades(c)
                          ^
C:165:tercia: Operator not followed by a space
        elif b >=3 and b <= 9:
               ^^
C:178:tercia: Operator not followed by a space
                resultado ='ciento '+unidades(c)
                          ^
C:192:tercia: Operator not followed by a space
                resultado ='ciento veinti '+unidades(c)
                          ^
C:204:tercia: Operator not preceded by a space
            prefix='quinientos '
                  ^
C:206:tercia: Operator not preceded by a space
            prefix='setecientos '
                  ^
C:208:tercia: Operator not preceded by a space
            prefix='novecientos '
                  ^
C:210:tercia: Operator not preceded by a space
            prefix=unidades(a)+'cientos '
                  ^
R:137:tercia: Too many return statements (23/6)
R:137:tercia: Too many branches (41/12)
R:137:tercia: Too many statements (73/50)


Report
======
141 statements analysed.

Raw metrics
-----------

+----------+-------+------+---------+-----------+
|type      |number |%     |previous |difference |
+==========+=======+======+=========+===========+
|code      |144    |68.25 |NC       |NC         |
+----------+-------+------+---------+-----------+
|docstring |5      |2.37  |NC       |NC         |
+----------+-------+------+---------+-----------+
|comment   |57     |27.01 |NC       |NC         |
+----------+-------+------+---------+-----------+
|empty     |5      |2.37  |NC       |NC         |
+----------+-------+------+---------+-----------+



Statistics by type
------------------

+---------+-------+-----------+-----------+------------+---------+
|type     |number |old number |difference |%documented |%badname |
+=========+=======+===========+===========+============+=========+
|module   |1      |NC         |NC         |0.00        |0.00     |
+---------+-------+-----------+-----------+------------+---------+
|class    |0      |NC         |NC         |0           |0        |
+---------+-------+-----------+-----------+------------+---------+
|method   |0      |NC         |NC         |0           |0        |
+---------+-------+-----------+-----------+------------+---------+
|function |6      |NC         |NC         |0.00        |0.00     |
+---------+-------+-----------+-----------+------------+---------+



Duplication
-----------

+-------------------------+------+---------+-----------+
|                         |now   |previous |difference |
+=========================+======+=========+===========+
|nb duplicated lines      |0     |NC       |NC         |
+-------------------------+------+---------+-----------+
|percent duplicated lines |0.000 |NC       |NC         |
+-------------------------+------+---------+-----------+



Messages by category
--------------------

+-----------+-------+---------+-----------+
|type       |number |previous |difference |
+===========+=======+=========+===========+
|convention |32     |NC       |NC         |
+-----------+-------+---------+-----------+
|refactor   |3      |NC       |NC         |
+-----------+-------+---------+-----------+
|warning    |1      |NC       |NC         |
+-----------+-------+---------+-----------+
|error      |0      |NC       |NC         |
+-----------+-------+---------+-----------+



Messages
--------

+-----------+------------+
|message id |occurrences |
+===========+============+
|C0103      |14          |
+-----------+------------+
|C0322      |6           |
+-----------+------------+
|C0112      |5           |
+-----------+------------+
|C0323      |4           |
+-----------+------------+
|C0111      |2           |
+-----------+------------+
|W0613      |1           |
+-----------+------------+
|R0915      |1           |
+-----------+------------+
|R0912      |1           |
+-----------+------------+
|R0911      |1           |
+-----------+------------+
|C0324      |1           |
+-----------+------------+



Global evaluation
-----------------
Your code has been rated at 7.45/10

I hope it helps.

I highly recommend the use of pylint to rate your code, and keep a standard way of programming, specially in a community of developers. =)

I hope it helps.

Answer 5

My company's style guidelines specifically call for tabs, not spaces. PEP 8 hints that spaces are preferable but we've found the opposite. I like to see code indented 4 'spaces' in VIM, a coworker prefers 8 'spaces' in Emacs. Using tabs lets us both set our editors to show the code as we prefer it.

Note that in other C-based languages, indentation is in fact merely formatting but in Python indentation is syntax, thus we feel that indentation level 2 should be represented by 2 of something (i.e. tabs) not 4 or 8 of something (i.e. spaces).

Indentation character selection is probably the original holy flame war (even before the VIM / Emacs flamewars) so I do expected to be modded to oblivion for expressing an opinion on the subject!

Answer 6

The "79 characters per line" part is nonsense. Their very own example shows how unreadable code becomes when doing this:

class Rectangle(Blob):

    def __init__(self, width, height,
                 color='black', emphasis=None, highlight=0):
        if width == 0 and height == 0 and \
           color == 'red' and emphasis == 'strong' or \
           highlight > 100:
            raise ValueError("sorry, you lose")
        if width == 0 and height == 0 and (color == 'red' or
                                           emphasis is None):
            raise ValueError("I don't think so -- values are %s, %s" %
                             (width, height))
        Blob.__init__(self, width, height,
                      color, emphasis, highlight)

It's like try-
ing to read
a news arti-
cle written
like this.

80-column terminals havn't been a serious development environment for over a decade. When I do need to edit from a crippled 80x25 environment in a pinch, editor wrapping is a minor inconvenience; I'm not going to maim my code during normal development just to avoid that.

120 column wrapping is perfectly sensible for modern development, and I have no problem with 140. This guideline is obsolete and following it results in ugly, hard-to-read code.