Catching panics in Golang

2019-03-09 15:58发布

With the following code, if no file argument is given, a panic is thrown for line 9 panic: runtime error: index out of range as expected.

How can I 'catch' this panic and handle it when directly when passing something to it (os.Args[1]) that causes the panic? Much like try/catch in PHP or try/except in Python.

I've had a search here on StackOverflow but I've not found anything that answers this as such.

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "os"
)

func main() {
    file, err := os.Open(os.Args[1])
    if err != nil {
        fmt.Println("Could not open file")
    }
    fmt.Printf("%s", file)
}

7条回答
甜甜的少女心
2楼-- · 2019-03-09 16:42

A panicking program can recover with the builtin recover() function:

The recover function allows a program to manage behavior of a panicking goroutine. Suppose a function G defers a function D that calls recover and a panic occurs in a function on the same goroutine in which G is executing. When the running of deferred functions reaches D, the return value of D's call to recover will be the value passed to the call of panic. If D returns normally, without starting a new panic, the panicking sequence stops. In that case, the state of functions called between G and the call to panic is discarded, and normal execution resumes. Any functions deferred by G before D are then run and G's execution terminates by returning to its caller.

The return value of recover is nil if any of the following conditions holds:

  • panic's argument was nil;
  • the goroutine is not panicking;
  • recover was not called directly by a deferred function.

Here is an example of how to use this:

// access buf[i] and return an error if that fails.
func PanicExample(buf []int, i int) (x int, err error) {
    defer func() {
        // recover from panic if one occured. Set err to nil otherwise.
        if (recover() != nil) {
            err = errors.New("array index out of bounds")
        }
    }()

    x = buf[i]
}

Notice that more often than not, panicking is not the right solution. The Go paradigm is to check for errors explicitly. A program should only panic if the circumstances under which it panics do not happen during ordinary program executing. For instance, not being able to open a file is something that can happen and should not cause a panic while running out of memory is worth a panic. Nevertheless, this mechanism exists to be able to catch even these cases and perhaps shut down gracefully.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答