I'd like to make a commit and close its branch, without removing it from history.
With mercurial I'd commit --close-branch
, then update
to a previous one, and go on working. With git... I'm confused.
I'd like to make a commit and close its branch, without removing it from history.
With mercurial I'd commit --close-branch
, then update
to a previous one, and go on working. With git... I'm confused.
There's no exact equivalent to closing a branch in Git, because Git branches are more lightweight than in Mercurial. Their Mercurial equivalent is more bookmarks than branches.
If I understand correctly, closing a branch in Mercurial roughly makes it disappear from the branch list, so you can achieve the same thing by archiving it. A usual practice is to tag its tip as archive, and delete it:
The branch will be deleted, and can be retrieved later by checking out the tag, and recreating the branch: