The opposite of Intersect()

2019-01-05 09:03发布

Intersect can be used to find matches between two collections, like so:

// Assign two arrays.
int[] array1 = { 1, 2, 3 };
int[] array2 = { 2, 3, 4 };
// Call Intersect extension method.
var intersect = array1.Intersect(array2);
// Write intersection to screen.
foreach (int value in intersect)
{
    Console.WriteLine(value); // Output: 2, 3
}

However what I'd like to achieve is the opposite, I'd like to list the items that are missing when comparing two collections:

// Assign two arrays.
int[] array1 = { 1, 2, 3 };
int[] array2 = { 2, 3, 4 };
// Call Intersect extension method.
var intersect = array1.NonIntersect(array2); // I've made up the NonIntersect method
// Write intersection to screen.
foreach (int value in intersect)
{
    Console.WriteLine(value); // Output: 1, 4
}

8条回答
走好不送
2楼-- · 2019-01-05 09:17

As stated, if you want to get 4 as the result, you can do like this:

var nonintersect = array2.Except(array1);

If you want the real non-intersection (also both 1 and 4), then this should do the trick:

var nonintersect = array1.Except(array2).Union( array2.Except(array1));

This will not be the most performant solution, but for small lists it should work just fine.

查看更多
何必那么认真
3楼-- · 2019-01-05 09:17

You can use

a.Except(b).Union(b.Except(a));

Or you can use

var difference = new HashSet(a);
difference.SymmetricExceptWith(b);
查看更多
走好不送
4楼-- · 2019-01-05 09:20

This code enumerates each sequence only once and uses Select(x => x) to hide the result to get a clean Linq-style extension method. Since it uses HashSet<T> its runtime is O(n + m) if the hashes are well distributed. Duplicate elements in either list are omitted.

public static IEnumerable<T> SymmetricExcept<T>(this IEnumerable<T> seq1,
    IEnumerable<T> seq2)
{
    HashSet<T> hashSet = new HashSet<T>(seq1);
    hashSet.SymmetricExceptWith(seq2);
    return hashSet.Select(x => x);
}
查看更多
叛逆
5楼-- · 2019-01-05 09:20

array1.NonIntersect(array2);

Nonintersect such operator is not present in Linq you should do

except -> union -> except

a.except(b).union(b.Except(a));
查看更多
混吃等死
6楼-- · 2019-01-05 09:22
string left = "411329_SOFT_MAC_GREEN";
string right= "SOFT_MAC_GREEN";

string[] l = left.Split('_');
string[] r = right.Split('_');

string[] distinctLeft = l.Distinct().ToArray();
string[] distinctRight = r.Distinct().ToArray();

var commonWord = l.Except(r, StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
string result = String.Join("_",commonWord);
result = "411329"
查看更多
时光不老,我们不散
7楼-- · 2019-01-05 09:30

I think you might be looking for Except:

The Except operator produces the set difference between two sequences. It will only return elements in the first sequence that don't appear in the second. You can optionally provide your own equality comparison function.

Check out this link, this link, or Google, for more information.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答