I have a SQL script that has to be run every time a client executes the "database management" functionality. The script includes creating stored procedures on the client database. Some of these clients might already have the stored procedure upon running the script, and some may not. I need to have the missing stored procedures added to the client database, but it doesn't matter how much I try to bend T-SQL syntax, I get
CREATE/ALTER PROCEDURE' must be the first statement in a query batch
I've read that dropping before creating works, but I don't like doing it that way.
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE type = 'P' AND name = 'MyProc')
DROP PROCEDURE MyProc
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE MyProc
...
How can I add check for the existence of a stored procedure and create it if it doesn't exist but alter it if it does exist?
Here's a method and some reasoning behind using it this way. It isn't as pretty to edit the stored proc but there are pros and cons...
UPDATE: You can also wrap this entire call in a TRANSACTION. Including many stored procedures in a single transaction which can all commit or all rollback. Another advantage of wrapping in a transaction is the stored procedure always exists for other SQL connections as long as they do not use the READ UNCOMMITTED transaction isolation level!
1) To avoid alters just as a process decision. Our processes are to always IF EXISTS DROP THEN CREATE. If you do the same pattern of assuming the new PROC is the desired proc, catering for alters is a bit harder because you would have an IF EXISTS ALTER ELSE CREATE.
2) You have to put CREATE/ALTER as the first call in a batch so you can't wrap a sequence of procedure updates in a transaction outside dynamic SQL. Basically if you want to run a whole stack of procedure updates or roll them all back without restoring a DB backup, this is a way to do everything in a single batch.
I wonder! Why i don't write the whole query like
i already know that first two procedures are already exist sql will run the query will give the error of first two procedures but still it will create the last procedure SQl is itself taking care of what is already exist this is what i always do to all my clients!
DROP IF EXISTS is a new feature of SQL Server 2016
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sqlserverstorageengine/2015/11/03/drop-if-exists-new-thing-in-sql-server-2016/
I realize this has already been marked as answered, but we used to do it like this:
Just to avoid dropping the procedure.
I had the same error. I know this thread is pretty much dead already but I want to set another option besides "anonymous procedure".
I solved it like this:
Check if the stored procedure exist:
However the
"CREATE/ALTER PROCEDURE' must be the first statement in a query batch"
is still there. I solved it like this:I end up with this code:
In addition to the answer from @Geoff I've created a simple tool which generates a SQL-file which statements for Stored Procedures, Views, Functions and Triggers.
See MyDbUtils @ CodePlex.