.NET Framework supported empty action syntax or si

2019-03-03 04:47发布

When working with existing frameworks, sometimes you need to pass in an action delegate which performs no action usually an extension point added by the original developer. Example:

var anObject = new Foo(() => { });

And presumably the Foo object will call this delegate at some time. My goal here is to eliminate the use of { }, because my style dictates that { } need to be on their own, and separate lines, and I'm a bit OCD and hate being verbose if I don't have to be.

When dealing with an action which returns a value, this is simple enough- you can provide an expression instead of a statement (thus eliminating the braces.) Example:

var anObject = new Foo(() => string.Empty);

So, I suppose the question is two parts...

Does .NET have any sort of default empty action? Is there syntactic sugar for providing an empty expression to a lambda, other than { }?

The current solution I'm leaning towards is to define the delegate in a preceding assignment to avoid having to use the lambda expressing inside a function invocation.

1条回答
爱情/是我丢掉的垃圾
2楼-- · 2019-03-03 05:19

There's nothing built-in that I'm aware of.

You could just define the delegate once as a helper singleton:

var anObject = new Foo(NoOpAction.Instance);

// ...

var anotherObject = new Bar(NoOpAction.Instance);

// ...

public static class NoOpAction
{
    private static readonly Action _instance = () => {};

    public static Action Instance
    {
        get { return _instance; }
    }
}

And because you're handed exactly the same delegate every time you use NoOpAction.Instance throughout your program, you're also saving on the (admittedly small) cost of creating and garbage-collecting multiple delegates that all do the same thing.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答