Either upper or lower case is "correct". However if you use web fonts and care about IE7, I'd recommend using <!DOCTYPE html> because of a bug in IE7 where web fonts sometimes fail if using <!doctype html> (e.g. in this answer).
This specification does not define any syntax-level requirements
beyond those defined for XML proper.
XML documents may contain a DOCTYPE if desired, but this is not required
to conform to this specification. This specification does not define
a public or system identifier, nor provide a formal DTD.
Looking at the XML spec, it lists DOCTYPE in caps, but I can't find anything that states that 'all caps' is required ( for comparison, in the HTML5 spec listed above, it is displayed in the example in all caps, but the spec explicitly states that is is case-insensitive ).
Polyglot markup uses a document type declaration (DOCTYPE) specified by section 8.1.1 of [HTML5]. In addition, the DOCTYPE conforms to the following rules:
* The string DOCTYPE is in uppercase letters.
So, note that Ployglot Markup uses a regular HTML5 doctype, but with additions/changes. For our discussion, most notably that DOCTYPE is declared in all caps.
[Opinion] I wouldn't worry too much about satisfying XML compliance unless you are specifically trying to make considerations for it. For most client and JS-based server development, JSON has replaced XML.
Therefore, I can only see this really applying if you are trying to update an existing, xhtml/xml-based legacy system to co-exist with new, HTML5 functionality. If this is the case then look into the polyglot markup spec.
According to the latest spec, you should use something that is a case-insensitive match for <!DOCTYPE html>. So while browsers are required to support whatever case you prefer, it's reasonable to infer from this that <!DOCTYPE html> is the canonical case.
The question sort of implies there's only one correct answer, supplies a multiple choice of two, and asks us to pick one. I would suggest that for HTML5 both <!DOCTYPE html> and <!doctype html> are valid.
So a HTML5-capable browser would accept the lowercase one and process the html properly.
Browsers previous and oblivious to HTML5, I've heard, even without a doctype, will attempt to process the html as best they can. And if they don't recognize the lowercase doctype will do the same. So there's no point in making it uppercase since those browsers won't be able to fully implement any HTML5 declarations anyway.
Either upper or lower case is "correct". However if you use web fonts and care about IE7, I'd recommend using
<!DOCTYPE html>
because of a bug in IE7 where web fonts sometimes fail if using<!doctype html>
(e.g. in this answer).This is why I always upper-case the doctype.
In HTML, the DOCTYPE is case insensitive. The following DOCTYPEs are all valid:
In XML serializations (i.e. XHTML) the DOCTYPE is not required, but if you use it,
DOCTYPE
should be uppercase:See The XML serialization of HTML5, aka ‘XHTML5’:
If anyone is still wondering in 2014, please consult this:
HTML5
W3 HTML5 Spec - Doctype
Note: despite being displayed in all caps, the spec states it is insensitive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
XHTML5
W3 HTML5 - XHTML
Looking at the XML spec, it lists DOCTYPE in caps, but I can't find anything that states that 'all caps' is required ( for comparison, in the HTML5 spec listed above, it is displayed in the example in all caps, but the spec explicitly states that is is case-insensitive ).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Polyglot Markup
W3 Polyglot Markup - Intro
W3 Polyglot Markup - Doctype
So, note that Ployglot Markup uses a regular HTML5 doctype, but with additions/changes. For our discussion, most notably that DOCTYPE is declared in all caps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summation
View the W3's HTML vs. XHTML section
[Opinion] I wouldn't worry too much about satisfying XML compliance unless you are specifically trying to make considerations for it. For most client and JS-based server development, JSON has replaced XML.
Therefore, I can only see this really applying if you are trying to update an existing, xhtml/xml-based legacy system to co-exist with new, HTML5 functionality. If this is the case then look into the polyglot markup spec.
According to the latest spec, you should use something that is a case-insensitive match for
<!DOCTYPE html>
. So while browsers are required to support whatever case you prefer, it's reasonable to infer from this that<!DOCTYPE html>
is the canonical case.The question sort of implies there's only one correct answer, supplies a multiple choice of two, and asks us to pick one. I would suggest that for HTML5 both
<!DOCTYPE html>
and<!doctype html>
are valid.So a HTML5-capable browser would accept the lowercase one and process the html properly.
Browsers previous and oblivious to HTML5, I've heard, even without a doctype, will attempt to process the html as best they can. And if they don't recognize the lowercase doctype will do the same. So there's no point in making it uppercase since those browsers won't be able to fully implement any HTML5 declarations anyway.
The standard for HTML5 is that tags are case insensitive.
http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_doctype.asp
More Technically: (http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html)
A DOCTYPE must consist of the following components, in this order:
<!DOCTYPE
.