For instance, consider the DFT or DCT. Precisely, what would be the differences between an image transformed by sub-blocks, and an image transformed whole? Is the resulting file size smaller? Is the algorithm more efficient? Does the transformed image look different? Thanks.
相关问题
- Views base64 encoded blob in HTML with PHP
- How to get the background from multiple images by
- iOS (objective-c) compression_decode_buffer() retu
- CV2 Image Error: error: (-215:Assertion failed) !s
- Replace image attributes for lazyload plugin on im
相关文章
- Use savefig in Python with string and iterative in
- Where does this quality loss on Images come from?
- Specifying image dimensions in HTML vs CSS for pag
- How to insert pictures into each individual bar in
- How do I append metadata to an image in Matlab?
- Img url to dataurl using JavaScript
- Click an image, get coordinates
- C# Saving huge images
They are designed so they can be implemented using parallel hardware. Each block is independent, and can be calculated on a different computing node, or shared out to as many nodes as you have.
Also as noted in an answer to Why JPEG compression processes image by 8x8 blocks? the computational complexity is high. I thing block_y_size2 × block_y_size2
It's to make the image smaller. There a many ways to subdivide an image into blocks. The most simple is by complete rows. More advance tiling is with fractals, i.e hilbert curve. Jpeg 2000 uses a hilbert curve. It uses additional spatial information and it's also used in mapping applications.