Trying to solve a problem of preventing duplicate images to be uploaded.
I have two JPGs. Looking at them I can see that they are in fact identical. But for some reason they have different file size (one is pulled from a backup, the other is another upload) and so they have a different md5 checksum.
How can I efficiently and confidently compare two images in the same sense as a human would be able to see that they are clearly identical?
Example: http://static.peterbe.com/a.jpg and http://static.peterbe.com/b.jpg
Update
I wrote this script:
import math, operator
from PIL import Image
def compare(file1, file2):
image1 = Image.open(file1)
image2 = Image.open(file2)
h1 = image1.histogram()
h2 = image2.histogram()
rms = math.sqrt(reduce(operator.add,
map(lambda a,b: (a-b)**2, h1, h2))/len(h1))
return rms
if __name__=='__main__':
import sys
file1, file2 = sys.argv[1:]
print compare(file1, file2)
Then I downloaded the two visually identical images and ran the script. Output:
58.9830484122
Can anybody tell me what a suitable cutoff should be?
Update II
The difference between a.jpg and b.jpg is that the second one has been saved with PIL:
b=Image.open('a.jpg')
b.save(open('b.jpg','wb'))
This apparently applies some very very light quality modifications. I've now solved my problem by applying the same PIL save to the file being uploaded without doing anything with it and it now works!
I guess you should decode the images and do a pixel by pixel comparison to see if they're reasonably similar.
With PIL and Numpy you can do it quite easily:
This will give you a numeric value that should be very close to 0 if the images are quite the same.
Note that images that are shifted/rotated will be reported as very different, as the pixels won't match one by one.
First, I should note they’re not identical; b has been recompressed and lost quality. You can see this if you look carefully on a good monitor.
To determine that they are subjectively “the same,” you would have to do something like what fortran suggested, although you will have to arbitrarily establish a threshold for “sameness.” To make s independent of image size, and to handle channels a little more sensibly, I would consider doing the RMS (root mean square) Euclidean distance in colorspace between the pixels of the two images. I don’t have time to write out the code right now, but basically for each pixel, you compute
, adding in an
(A_2 - A_1) ** 2
term if the image has an alpha channel, etc. The result is the square of the colorspace distance between the two images. Find the mean (average) across all pixels, then take the square root of the resulting scalar. Then decide a reasonable threshold for this value.
Or, you might just decide that copies of the same original image with different lossy compression are not truly “the same” and stick with the file hash.
Using ImageMagick, you can simply use in your shell [or call via the OS library from within a program]
This will create an output image with the differences marked
Will give you a fuzziness factor of 5% to ignore minor pixel differences. More information can be procured from here
the problem of knowing what makes some features of the image more important than other is a whole scientific program. I would suggest some alternatives depending on the solution you want:
if your problem is to see if there is a flipping of bits in your JPEGs, then try to image the difference image (there was perhaps a minor edit locally?),
to see if images are globally the same, use the Kullback Leibler distance to compare your histograms,
to see if you have some qualittative change, before applying other answers, filter your image using the functions below to raise the importance of high-level frequencies:
code:
(shameless copy from http://www.incm.cnrs-mrs.fr/LaurentPerrinet/Publications/Perrinet08spie )
I tested this one and it works the best of all methods and extremly fast!
here link for reference
You can either compare it using PIL (iterate through pixels / segments of the picture and compare) or if you're looking for a complete identical copy comparison, try comparing the MD5 hash of both files.