I have heard that JSF is implementing the component based MVC and Spring MVC is implementing the request based MVC. I would like to know what is the exact technical difference between these two types.
相关问题
- java.lang.NullPointerException at java.io.PrintWri
- h:selectOneMenu in p:dataTable doesn't submit
- How to dynamically load partial view Via jquery aj
- PrimeFaces block UI does not work when the compone
- org.apache.commons.fileupload.disk.DiskFileItem is
相关文章
- spring-mvc a标签带参怎样向controller发送请求。路径格式?
- Java spring framework - how to set content type?
- Java/Spring MVC: provide request context to child
- Spring 5 Web Reactive - Hot Publishing - How to us
- Forward request from servlet to jsp
- Spring MVC project not able to publish and run… Me
- Intercept @RequestHeader exception for missing hea
- superclass mismatch for class CommentsController (
In request (action) based MVC, a single front controller servlet will delegate to action models based on request URL/params. You work directly with raw
HttpServletRequest
andHttpServletResponse
objects in the action model. You've to write code yourself to gather, convert and validate the request parameters and if necessary update the model values before you can ever invoke the business action.In component based MVC, a single front controller will gather, convert and validate request parameters and update the model values itself so that you only need to worry about the business action yourself. How the controller needs to gather/convert/validate/update the values is definied in a single place, the view. Since that's not possible with "plain" HTML, a specific markup language is required to achieve the goal. In case of JSF 2.0, that's XML (XHTML) based. You use XML to define UI components which in turn contain information about how the controller should gather/convert/validate/update the model values and generate/render the necessary HTML representation.
Advantages and disadvantages should be clear at this point: With a request based MVC framework you need to write more (boilerplate) code yourself to achieve the goal. However you end up with much more fine grained control over the process and the HTML/CSS/JS output. With a component based MVC framework you don't need to write much code yourself. However you have less fine grained control over the process and the HTML/CSS/JS output. So if you'd like to do things a bit differently than the standard describes and/or the implementation provides, then you'll waste a lot more time in a component based MVC framework when you're not well versed with its ins and outs.
Manfred Riem (JSF 2.x team member and ex Java EE 8 MVC 1.0 spec lead) has outlined it nicely during his speech about MVC 1.0 (JSR 371) on Devoxx 14:
See also: