Checking for a dirty index or untracked files with

2019-01-04 15:34发布

How can I check if I have any uncommitted changes in my git repository:

  1. Changes added to the index but not committed
  2. Untracked files

from a script?

git-status seems to always return zero with git version 1.6.4.2.

标签: git shell
12条回答
Deceive 欺骗
2楼-- · 2019-01-04 16:24

The key to reliably “scripting” Git is to use the ‘plumbing’ commands.

The developers take care when changing the plumbing commands to make sure they provide very stable interfaces (i.e. a given combination of repository state, stdin, command line options, arguments, etc. will produce the same output in all versions of Git where the command/option exists). New output variations in plumbing commands can be introduced via new options, but that can not introduce any problems for programs that have already been written against older versions (they would not be using the new options, since they did not exist (or at least were not used) at the time the script was written).

Unfortunately the ‘everyday’ Git commands are the ‘porcelain’ commands, so most Git users may not be familiar with with the plumbing commands. The distinction between porcelain and plumbing command is made in the main git manpage (see subsections titled High-level commands (porcelain) and Low-level commands (plumbing).


To find out about uncomitted changes, you will likely need git diff-index (compare index (and maybe tracked bits of working tree) against some other treeish (e.g. HEAD)), maybe git diff-files (compare working tree against index), and possibly git ls-files (list files; e.g. list untracked, unignored files).

(Note that in the below commands, HEAD -- is used instead of HEAD because otherwise the command fails if there is a file named HEAD.)

To check whether a repository has staged changes (not yet committed) use this:

git diff-index --quiet --cached HEAD --
  • If it exits with 0 then there were no differences (1 means there were differences).

To check whether a working tree has changes that could be staged:

git diff-files --quiet
  • The exit code is the same as for git diff-index (0 == no differences; 1 == differences).

To check whether the combination of the index and the tracked files in the working tree have changes with respect to HEAD:

git diff-index --quiet HEAD --
  • This is like a combination of the previous two. One prime difference is that it will still report “no differences” if you have a staged change that you have “undone” in the working tree (gone back to the contents that are in HEAD). In this same situation, the two separate commands would both return reports of “differences present”.

You also mentioned untracked files. You might mean “untracked and unignored”, or you might mean just plain “untracked” (including ignored files). Either way, git ls-files is the tool for the job:

For “untracked” (will include ignored files, if present):

git ls-files --others

For “untracked and unignored”:

git ls-files --exclude-standard --others

My first thought is to just check whether these commands have output:

test -z "$(git ls-files --others)"
  • If it exits with 0 then there are no untracked files. If it exits with 1 then there are untracked files.

There is a small chance that this will translate abnormal exits from git ls-files into “no untracked files” reports (both result in non-zero exits of the above command). A bit more robust version might look like this:

u="$(git ls-files --others)" && test -z "$u"
  • The idea is the same as the previous command, but it allows unexpected errors from git ls-files to propagate out. In this case a non-zero exit could mean “there are untracked files” or it could mean an error occurred. If you want the “error” results combined with the “no untracked files” result instead, use test -n "$u" (where exit of 0 means “some untracked files”, and non-zero means error or “no untracked files”).

Another idea is to use --error-unmatch to cause a non-zero exit when there are no untracked files. This also runs the risk of conflating “no untracked files” (exit 1) with “an error occurred” (exit non-zero, but probably 128). But checking for 0 vs. 1 vs. non-zero exit codes is probably fairly robust:

git ls-files --others --error-unmatch . >/dev/null 2>&1; ec=$?
if test "$ec" = 0; then
    echo some untracked files
elif test "$ec" = 1; then
    echo no untracked files
else
    echo error from ls-files
fi

Any of the above git ls-files examples can take --exclude-standard if you want to consider only untracked and unignored files.

查看更多
Fickle 薄情
3楼-- · 2019-01-04 16:26

Had a look through a few of these answers... (and had various issues on *nix and windows, which was a requirement I had)... found the following worked well...

git diff --no-ext-diff --quiet --exit-code

To check the exit code in *nix

echo $?   
#returns 1 if the repo has changes (0 if clean)

To check the exit code in window$

echo %errorlevel% 
#returns 1 if the repos has changes (0 if clean) 

Sourced from https://github.com/sindresorhus/pure/issues/115 Thanks to @paulirish on that post for sharing

查看更多
倾城 Initia
4楼-- · 2019-01-04 16:26

One DIY possibility, updated to follow 0xfe's suggestion

#!/bin/sh
exit $(git status --porcelain | wc -l) 

As noted by Chris Johnsen, this only works on Git 1.7.0 or newer.

查看更多
走好不送
5楼-- · 2019-01-04 16:26

Here is the best, cleanest way. The selected answer didn't work for me for some reason, it didn't pick up changes staged that were new files that weren't committed.

function git_dirty {
    text=$(git status)
    changed_text="Changes to be committed"
    untracked_files="Untracked files"

    dirty=false

    if [[ ${text} = *"$changed_text"* ]];then
        dirty=true
    fi

    if [[ ${text} = *"$untracked_files"* ]];then
        dirty=true
    fi

    echo $dirty
}
查看更多
我只想做你的唯一
6楼-- · 2019-01-04 16:28

This is a more shell friendly variation for finding out if any untracked files exist in the repository:

# Works in bash and zsh
if [[ "$(git status --porcelain 2>/dev/null)" = *\?\?* ]]; then
  echo untracked files
fi

This doesn't fork a second process, grep, and doesn't need a check for if you are in a git repository or not. Which is handy for shell prompts, etc.

查看更多
不美不萌又怎样
7楼-- · 2019-01-04 16:28

You can also do

git describe --dirty

. It will append the word "-dirty" at the end if it detects a dirty working tree. According to git-describe(1):

   --dirty[=<mark>]
       Describe the working tree. It means describe HEAD and appends <mark> (-dirty by default) if
       the working tree is dirty.

. Caveat: untracked files are not considered "dirty", because, as the manpage states, it only cares about the working tree.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答