As discussed in this question, C++11 optimizes endless loops away.
However, in embedded devices which have a single purpose, endless loops make sense and are actually quite often used. Even a completely empty while(1);
is useful for a watchdog-assisted reset. Terminating but empty loops can also be useful in embedded development.
Is there an elegant way to specifically tell the compiler to not remove empty or endless loops, without disabling optimization altogether?
One of the requirements for a loop to be removed (as mentioned in that question) is that it
So,
should do the trick, although I would certainly verify this by looking at the disassembly of a program produced with your particular toolchain.
A function like this would be a good candidate for GCC's
noreturn
attribute as well.