We have two heads. One is our main development head and the other is one that I forgot about until today. We found a bug and fixed it in our main development branch, and I just realized it should be fixed in the older branch as well.
I think it would have been better to make the change on the older branch and merge that with the up-to-date branch, but we didn't do it that way. Can mercurial handle this? We haven't tried to do anything like this and I can't really wrap my head around how it would be done.
Yes, you have two good options:
Graft: new in Mercurial 2.0
This version introduced the graft command which can backport changes in an intelligent way. The "intelligence" is that it will use merges internally and this means that you get
Support for renames: Imagine that you fixed the bug in file
foo.c
on the development branch. In the older maintenance branchfoo.c
was calledbar.c
. Usinghg graft
, the change tofoo.c
can be correctly merged into the oldbar.c
.Three-way merges: Grafting involves twisting the graph around and merging in that temporary graph. The advantage of three-way merges is that you can use your normal graphical merge tool to resolve conflicts.
To copy the tip of
default
ontoold-branch
you simply runTransplant: older versions
Before we had the graft command, the transplant extension was the way to go. This simple extension will export a changeset as a patch and try to apply the patch onto some other revision.
Because we're dealing with "dumb" patches things like renames will not be taken into account and you will not get support for your merge tool since there is no three-way merge. Despite of this, I've found that transplant works really well in practice.
Using transplant is simple:
This is very close to running
except that transplant also adds a piece of meta data that records the original changeset in the transplanted changeset. This can be used to skip future transplants.