While iterating my code towards a correct version, I came across the following curiosity:
{-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}
module Foo where
import Data.Vector.Generic.Mutable as M
import Control.Monad.Primitive
-- an in-place vector function with dimension
data DimFun v m r =
DimFun Int (v (PrimState m) r -> m ())
eval :: (PrimMonad m, MVector v r) => DimFun v m r -> v (PrimState m) r -> m ()
eval = error ""
iterateFunc :: (PrimMonad m, MVector v r)
=> (forall v' . (MVector v' r) => DimFun v' m r) -> DimFun v m r
iterateFunc = error ""
f :: (PrimMonad m, MVector v r)
=> DimFun v m r
f = error ""
iteratedF :: (MVector v r, PrimMonad m)
=> v (PrimState m) r -> m ()
iteratedF y =
let f' = f
in eval (iterateFunc f') y
This code does not compile:
Testing/Foo.hs:87:14:
Could not deduce (MVector v0 r) arising from a use of ‘f’
from the context (MVector v r, PrimMonad m)
bound by the type signature for
iteratedF :: (MVector v r, PrimMonad m) =>
v (PrimState m) r -> m ()
at Testing/Foo.hs:(84,14)-(85,39)
The type variable ‘v0’ is ambiguous
Relevant bindings include
f' :: DimFun v0 m r (bound at Testing/Foo.hs:87:9)
y :: v (PrimState m) r (bound at Testing/Foo.hs:86:11)
iteratedF :: v (PrimState m) r -> m ()
(bound at Testing/Foo.hs:86:1)
In the expression: f
In an equation for ‘f'’: f' = f
In the expression: let f' = f in eval (iterateFunc f') y
Testing/Foo.hs:88:26:
Couldn't match type ‘v0’ with ‘v'’
because type variable ‘v'’ would escape its scope
This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by
a type expected by the context: MVector v' r => DimFun v' m r
at Testing/Foo.hs:88:14-27
Expected type: DimFun v' m r
Actual type: DimFun v0 m r
Relevant bindings include
f' :: DimFun v0 m r (bound at Testing/Foo.hs:87:9)
In the first argument of ‘iterateFunc’, namely ‘f'’
In the first argument of ‘eval’, namely ‘(iterateFunc f')’
Failed, modules loaded: none.
However, if I change the definition of iteratedF
to
iteratedF y = eval (iterateFunc f) y
the code compiles wtih GHC 7.8.2. This question is not about the strange-looking signatures or data types, it is simply this: why does renaming f
to f'
break the code? This seems like it has to be a bug to me.
The problem is of course not the renaming, but the binding to a new variable. Since
iterateFunc
is Rank-2, it needs a polymorphic argument function. Of course,f
is polymorphic inv
, so it can be used. But when you writef' = f
, it's not clear what typef'
should be: the same polymorphic type asf
, or some monomorphic type, possibly depending some relation to another type variable initeratedF
which the compiler hasn't deduced yet.The compiler defaults to the monomorphic option; as chi says this is the monomorphism restriction's fault here so if you turn it off your code actually compiles.
Still, the same problem can turn up even without the monomorphism restriction in
RankNTypes
code, it can't be avoided completely. The only reliable fix is a local signature, usually necessitatingScopedTypeVariables
.Disabling the monomorphism restriction, I can compile your code. So, just add
at the beginning of your file.
The reason for the type error is that the definition
does not use a function pattern (e.g.
f' x y = ...
), so the monomorphism restriction kicks in and forcesf'
to be monomorphic, whileiterateFunc
requires a polymorphic function.Alternatively, add a type annotation