{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 三岁会撩人 的问题《Mutex analog in SQL?》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-370669.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
I have multiple threads, executing similar queries. They shouldn't be executed the same time. I can create and check mutex for this purpose from ADO.Net client, but for some reason I'd prefer to do this using SQL. Is it possible?
Regards,
相关问题
- SQL join to get the cartesian product of 2 columns
- sql execution latency when assign to a variable
- Difference between Types.INTEGER and Types.NULL in
- php PDO::FETCH_ASSOC doesnt detect select after ba
- Bulk update SQL Server C#
Yes it is. Application Locks (or Mutexes) in SQL Server 2005
Use the locking available in SQL Server:
Introduction to Locking in SQL Server