I have a DLL I inject into other processes using SetWindowsHookEx
. Inside the DLL I increment the module's reference counter by calling GetModuleHandleEx
so I can control when the module is unloaded.
At this point the module reference count "should be" 2 from both of those API calls. When the calling process shuts down, it calls UnhookWindowsHookEx
, decrementing the reference count to 1. The DLL has a thread that waits on a few things, one of them being the handle of the process that called SetWindowsHookEx
. When the process goes away the DLL does some cleanup, terminates all threads, cleans up memory and handles and then calls FreeLibraryAndExitThread
. This decrements the counter and the DLL gets unloaded.
Here's my problem. There are a few processes, especially those without a UI, where the DLL never gets unloaded. I'm pretty confident I have cleaned up everything. And I know for a fact that none of my threads are running.
First of all, if you have any troubleshooting tips to help uncover the cause, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I was thinking about using some API like NtQueryInformationProcess
to get the module address and confirm the module handle count is in fact zero, then call CreateRemoteThread
to inject a call to LdrUnloadDll
to unload the module address from within the process. What are your thoughts to this approach? Does anyone have any example code? I'm having difficulty finding out how to get the module handle count.
Okay.. here goes.. There are many ways to get the module info from a process. The undocumented way and the "documented" way.
Results (documented):
Here is the "documented" way..
The problem with the undocumented API is that I've never figured out why the load counts are always "6" for dynamic modules and "-1" for static modules.. For this reason, I will not post it..
It is BEST NOT to use undocumented API if you want just the load count. The undocumented API's only advantage is that you can use it to "un-link/hide" a module within a process (like viruses do).. It will "unlink/hide" it.. NOT "unload" it. This means that at any time, you can "re-link" it back into the process's module list.
Since you only need the module-reference-count, I've only included "documented" API which does exactly that.
I found the cause of the problem and the solution. I honestly feel quite stupid for missing it and struggling with it for so long.
As I mentioned in the original problem, the processes that are problematic do not have a UI. Turns out they do have a message pump running. The problem is nothing is sending messages to these processes without a UI after we call
UnhookWindowsHookEx
that would trigger the unloading. (In fact, I believe MSDN does state that window messages are not sent to processes when callingUnhookWindowsHookEx
.)By broadcasting WM_NULL to all processes after the injecting process calls
UnhookWindowsHookEx
the message pump wakes up in the injected processes and the DLL reference count is decremented. The DLL is unloaded immediately when the injected DLL finally callsFreeLibraryAndExitThread
.This is only part of the solution. If the injecting process is killed or crashes, no message is broadcasted so the DLL does not get unloaded from processes that do not have a UI. As I mention before I have a thread running in the DLL that waits on the injecting process handle. When the injecting process ends the DLL is signaled and then calls
PostThreadMessage
to send WM_NULL to each thread in the process. Then it waits until the DLL reference count is decremented before continuing and cleaning up before callingFreeLibraryAndExitThread
. As a result, the DLL is unloaded almost immediately from all processes, UI or no UI.