{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 Anthone 的问题《Why does MSVC not support inline assembly for AMD6》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-343393.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
Yesterday I learned that inline assembly (with the __asm keyword) is not supported under Microsoft Visual C++ when compiling for AMD64 and Itanium targets.
Is that correct? And if so, does anyone know why they would not support inline assembly for those targets? It seems like a rather big feature to just drop...
It's quite easy to call a function written with an assembler, as long as you follow C conventions. This tutorial explains how.
Correct, it still isn't supported in VS 2010 Beta 1. My guess is that inline assembly is just too difficult to implement: the way Microsoft implemented it, it integrates with the surrounding C code so that data can flow in and out of the C code, and appropriate glue code is automatically injected. For that, the C compiler actually needs to understand the assembler code; they just haven't implemented that for AMD64 and Itanium.