I have two stored procedures, one of which returns a list of payments, while the other returns a summary of those payments, grouped by currency. Right now, I have a duplicated query: the main query of the stored procedure that returns the list of payments is a subquery of the stored procedure that returns the summary of payments by currency. I would like to eliminate this duplicity by making the stored procedure that returns the list of payments a subquery of the stored procedure that returns the summary of payments by currency. Is that possible in SQL Server 2008?
相关问题
- sql execution latency when assign to a variable
- What is the best way to cache a table from a (SQL)
- php PDO::FETCH_ASSOC doesnt detect select after ba
- Bulk update SQL Server C#
- SQL to Parse a Key-Value String
相关文章
- Entity Framework 4.3.1 failing to create (/open) a
- Code for inserting data into SQL Server database u
- Delete Every Alternate Row in SQL
- Linux based PHP install connecting to MsSQL Server
- SQL Azure Reset autoincrement
- How do we alias a Sql Server instance name used in
- Is recursion good in SQL Server?
- How can I convert a OLE Automation Date value to a
Inserting the results of your stored proc into a table variable or temp table will do the trick.
If you're trying to reuse code in SQL Server from one query to the next, you have more flexibility with Table Functions. Views are all right if you don't need to pass parameters or use any kind of flow control logic. These may be used like tables in any other function, procedure, view or t-sql statement.
You can capture the output from a stored procedure in a temp table and then use the table in your main query.
Capture the output of a stored procedure returning columns ID and Name to a table variable.
You are better off converting the first proc into a TABLE-VALUED function. If it involves multiple statements, you need to first define the return table structure and populate it.
Sample:
-- becomes --
However, if it is a straight select (or can be written as a single statement), then you can use the INLINE tvf form, which is highly optimized
The second proc simply selects from the first proc
And where you used to call
to get a result, you now select from it
I would use a view, unless it needs to be parameterized, in which case I would use an inline table-valued function if possible, unless it needs to be a multi-statement operation, where you can still use a table-valued function, but they are usually less efficient.
If you made the procedure that returns the list into a table-valued function, then I believe you could use it in a sub-query.