Correct JSON Schema for an array of items of diffe

2019-02-16 05:08发布

I have an unordered array of JSON items. According to the specification http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zyp-json-schema-03#section-5.5 the json schema below will only validate if the objects in the array appear IN THAT ORDER. I don't want to specify an order, just validate the objects within the array, regardless of order or number of objects. From the spec I can't seem to understand how this is done.

"transactions" : {
    "type" : "array",
    "items" : [
        {
            "type" : "object",
            "properties" : {
                "type" : {
                    "type" : "string",
                    "enum" : ["BUILD", "REASSIGN"]
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "type" : "object",
            "properties" : {
                "type" : {
                    "type" : "string",
                    "enum" : ["BREAK"]
                }
            }
        }
    ]
}

4条回答
不美不萌又怎样
2楼-- · 2019-02-16 05:51

For anyone stuck with the draft 3 schema. There is a "Type" keyword that is equivalent to the "anyOf" in draft 4:

So you can use

{
    "fooBar" : {
        "type" : "array",
        "items" : {
            "type" : [{
                    "type" : "object",
                    "properties" : {
                        "foo" : {                           
                            "type" : "string"
                        }
                    }
                }, {
                    "type" : "object",
                    "properties" : {
                        "bar" : {
                            "type" : "string"
                        }
                    }
                }
            ]
        }
    }
}
查看更多
男人必须洒脱
3楼-- · 2019-02-16 06:00

I've been looking into this for quite a while too. But haven't been able to find a working solution. It works fine if you have only one schema eg.

"transactions" : {
          "type" : "array",
          "items" : 
          {
            "type" : "object",
            "properties" : {
              "type" : {
                "type" : "string",
                "enum" : ["BREAK"]
              },
          }
}

Then you just skip the array brackets, and use an object. However if you want to do what you are doing, there seems to be no solid answer. This is the only thing that I've found so far: http://the-long-dark-tech-time.blogspot.se/2012/12/using-json-schema-with-array-of-mixed.html

查看更多
家丑人穷心不美
4楼-- · 2019-02-16 06:07

As a response to user Vdex: this is not equivalent, what you wrote means that array elements occur in this particular order within the array.

Subject to a correct implementation, if you use this schema validator.

With this schema:

{
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-04/schema#",
  "type": "array",
  "items": [
    {
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    {
      "type": "number"
    },
    {
      "type": "string"
    }
  ]
}

This JSON will be validated:

[
  true,
  5,
  "a",
  "6",
  "a",
  5.2
]

But not this one:

[
  5,
  true,
  "a",
  "6",
  "a",
  5.2
]

Thus, the objective is totally different from keywords like "oneOf".

查看更多
何必那么认真
5楼-- · 2019-02-16 06:10

I asked this same question on the JSON schema google group, and it was answered quickly. User fge asked that I post his response here:

Hello,

The current specification is draft v4, not draft v3. More specifically, the validation specification is here:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fge-json-schema-validation-00

The web site is not up to date, I don't know why... I'll submit a pull request.

With draft v4 you can use this:

{
    "type": "array",
    "items": {
        "oneOf": [
            {"first": [ "schema", "here" ] }, 
            {"other": [ "schema": "here" ] }
        ]
    }  
}

For instance, this is a schema for an array where items can be either strings or integers (it can be written in a more simple way though):

{
    "type": "array",
    "items": {
        "oneOf": [
            {"type": "string"},
            {"type": "integer"}
        ]
    }
}

This is the correct answer. My corrected schema now includes:

"transactions" : {
    "type" : "array",
    "items" : {
        "oneOf" : [
            {
                "type" : "object",
                "properties" : {
                    "type" : {
                        "type" : "string",
                        "enum" : ["BUILD", "REASSIGN"]
                    }
                }
            },
            {
               "type" : "object",
               "properties" : {
                 "type" : {
                   "type" : "string",
                   "enum" : ["BREAK"]
                  }
               }
            }
        ]
    }
}
查看更多
登录 后发表回答