I'm working on a GUI application in WxPython, and I am not sure how I can ensure that only one copy of my application is running at any given time on the machine. Due to the nature of the application, running more than once doesn't make any sense, and will fail quickly. Under Win32, I can simply make a named mutex and check that at startup. Unfortunately, I don't know of any facilities in Linux that can do this.
I'm looking for something that will automatically be released should the application crash unexpectedly. I don't want to have to burden my users with having to manually delete lock files because I crashed.
There are several common techniques including using semaphores. The one I see used most often is to create a "pid lock file" on startup that contains the pid of the running process. If the file already exists when the program starts up, open it up and grab the pid inside, check to see if a process with that pid is running, if it is check the cmdline value in /proc/pid to see if it is an instance of your program, if it is then quit, otherwise overwrite the file with your pid. The usual name for the pid file is application_name
.pid
.I've made a basic framework for running these kinds of applications when you want to be able to pass the command line arguments of subsequent attempted instances to the first one. An instance will start listening on a predefined port if it does not find an instance already listening there. If an instance already exists, it sends its command line arguments over the socket and exits.
code w/ explanation
By far the most common method is to drop a file into /var/run/ called [application].pid which contains only the PID of the running process, or parent process. As an alternative, you can create a named pipe in the same directory to be able to send messages to the active process, e.g. to open a new file.
Here's the TCP port-based solution:
Complete locking solution using the
fcntl
module:This builds upon the answer by user zgoda. It mainly addresses a tricky concern having to do with write access to the lock file. In particular, if the lock file was first created by
root
, another userfoo
can then no successfully longer attempt to rewrite this file due to an absence of write permissions for userfoo
. The obvious solution seems to be to create the file with write permissions for everyone. This solution also builds upon a different answer by me, having to do creating a file with such custom permissions. This concern is important in the real world where your program may be run by any user includingroot
.A limitation of the above code is that if the lock file already existed with unexpected permissions, those permissions will not be corrected.
I would've liked to use
/var/run/<appname>/
as the directory for the lock file, but creating this directory requiresroot
permissions. You can make your own decision for which directory to use.Note that there is no need to open a file handle to the lock file.