I have a TClientDataSet
, which is provided by a TTable
’s dataset.
The dataset has two fields: postalcode (string, 5) and street (string, 20)
At runtime I want to display a third field (string, 20). The routine of this field is getting the postalcode as a parameter and gives back the city belongs to this postalcode.
The problem is only about adding a calculated field to the already existing ones. Filling the data itself is not the problem.
I tried:
cds.SetProvider(Table1);
cds.FieldDefs.Add('city', ftString, 20);
cds.Open;
cds.Edit;
cds.FieldByName('city').AsString := 'Test'; // --> errormessage (field not found)
cds.Post;
cds is my clientdataset, Table1
is a paradox Table, but the problem is the same with other databases.
Thanks in advance
Well i found a simpler solution, as i have 24 fields in my sql i didnt wanted to add them all manually so i added a dummy field to the sql statement instead like:
which i can modify in my program OnAfterOpen event.
Well i had to define in the sql how long that field should be by leaving enough empty spaces, for instance 5 empty spaces for 5 characters, so i must know how long the city name could be.
If you want to add additional fields other than those exist in the underlying data, you need to also add the existing fields manually as well. The dataset needs to be closed when you're adding fields, but you can have the necessary metadata with
FieldDefs.Update
if you don't want to track all field details manually. Basically something like this:Also see this excellent article by Cary Jensen.
You should use
CreateDataset
after add field:if you want to combine already existing "dynamic" data fields (from provider side) with additional client side persistent fields (calculated, lookup, internalcalc, aggregate) you should subclass CDS. just introduce extra boolean property CombineFields and either override BindFields (in newer delphi versions) or the entire InternalOpen (as I did in d2006/2007) with the following line
if DefaultFields or CombineFields then CreateFields; { TODO -ovavan -cSIC : if CombineFields is true then persistent fields will coexist with Default ones }
that will allow you to avoid all that runtime mess with FieldDefs/CreateField
Would like to share more accurate Query for unexisting fields. I bet it's better to use cast, neither spaces!
e.g.
| Marc'O | Polo | <NULL> |
It's more accurate, can definetly see field size, understandable, easy, safe!