I'm studying c++11 especially interested in lambda.
After some practices, I assumed that lambda closure is an nameless function object.
So I wrote this code.
template <class callable_object>
void lambda_caller( callable_object lambda )
{
std::cout<< sizeof(lambda) << endl;
lambda();
}
I know that I can use std::function
instead of using template, but I don't want the overhead while typecasting.
But I found one problem reading this question : Why can't I create a vector of lambda in C++11?
The answerer said, "Every lambda has a different type- even if they have the same signature.".
Compilers makes different codes for different classes.
So I think that my compiler will make another version of lambda_caller
whenever I make another definition of lambda to pass.
Is there any way to avoid it, except using std::function
? Isn't there any generic type for lambda closure?
std::function
is the generic type for lambda closures. The problem is that each lambda may capture different variables. So it can't be reduced to say a function pointer and some data, because the lambda may have captured 3 variables or it may have captured 4.std::function
will take care of making sure that enough memory is allocated for the data, but it comes at a cost(the data could be heap allocated).However, if you are wanting to store several lambdas, and you know how many at compile-time. You could store them in an
std::tuple
instead. Which allows different types for each lambda. Unfortunately, C++ still doesn't provide a way to iterate over a tuple, but using Boost.Fusion you can.You can't avoid it. Lambda is just a class with operator()() overloaded which executes your code. So different code - different classes.