django manytomanyfield .add() method

2019-02-13 14:40发布

Suppose i have :

class Album(models.Model):
    photos = models.ManyToManyField('myapp.Photo')
    photo_count = models.IntegerField(default = 0)

class Photo(models.Model):
    photo = models.ImageField(upload_to = 'blahblah')

What is want is, everytime i call .add() method, increment the photo_count on Album class, so i'm thinking to override .add() method. The problem is, i can't import the .add()'s class since it is inside a method, so it is like def->class->def. So is there anyway to override .add() ? Or there is a better way to do this?

2条回答
祖国的老花朵
2楼-- · 2019-02-13 15:16

You can use django's signals and write a signal handler that will increment the counter using the m2m_changed signal:

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/signals/#m2m-changed

查看更多
看我几分像从前
3楼-- · 2019-02-13 15:19

Probably the simplest option is to skip signals, drop the photo_count field entirely and call [album].photos.count() anywhere you would have used [album].photo_count.

You could also define a property on Album as follows:

class Album(models.Model):
    photos = models.ManyToManyField('myapp.Photo')

    @property
    def photo_count(self):
        return self.photos.count()

class Photo(models.Model):
    photo = models.ImageField(upload_to = 'blahblah')

The downside of both options is they makes it harder to search / sort based on the number of photos. They also don't store the count in the database. (That might be import if you have some non-Django application which is interacting with the same DB.) If you think you'll want to do those sorts of searches via Django, look into Django annotations.

This is simpler than dealing with signals, but probably still overkill.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答