copied as many times as you deem fitting to have as much processes
downloading. This isn't as elegant as a properly multithreaded app,
but it will get the job done with only a slight amount of over head.
the key here being the "-N" switch. This means transfer the file only
if it is newer than what's on the disk. This will (mostly) prevent
each process from downloading the same file a different process
already downloaded, but skip the file and download what some other
process hasn't downloaded. It uses the time stamp as a means of doing
this, hence the slight overhead.
It works great for me and saves a lot of time. Don't have too many
processes as this may saturate the web site's connection and tick off
the owner. Keep it around a max of 4 or so. However, the number is
only limited by CPU and network bandwidth on both ends.
etc. This syntax will work in any Unix-like environment (e.g. Linux or MacOS); not sure how to do this in Windows.
Wget itself does not support multithreaded operations - at least, neither the manpage nor its website has any mention of this. Anyway, since wget supports HTTP keepalive, the bottleneck is usually the bandwidth of the connection, not the number of simultaneous downloads.
Use
axel
to download with multi connectionsI found a decent solution.
Read original at http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/wget-multi-threaded-downloading-457375/
With the use of parallel wget utilizing the xargs switch, this solution seems so much better:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/11850469/1647809
Well, you can always run multiple instances of
wget
, no?Example:
etc. This syntax will work in any Unix-like environment (e.g. Linux or MacOS); not sure how to do this in Windows.
Wget itself does not support multithreaded operations - at least, neither the manpage nor its website has any mention of this. Anyway, since wget supports HTTP keepalive, the bottleneck is usually the bandwidth of the connection, not the number of simultaneous downloads.