What are the limitations of SqlDependency

Question

I am using a table as a message queue and "signing up" for up for updates by using a SqlDependency. Everywhere I read people are saying look out for the limitations of it but not specifically saying what they are. From what I've gathered you will have problems when the table has very high update frequency, fortunately I'm only looking at 10 - 20 values per minute maximum.

What are the other limitations/impact on the SqlServer?

Answer 1

The most complete list I can find (from here) is as follows:

• The projected columns in the SELECT statement must be explicitly stated, and table names must be qualified with two-part names. Notice that this means that all tables referenced in the statement must be in the same database.
• The statement may not use the asterisk () or table_name. syntax to specify columns.
• The statement may not use unnamed columns or duplicate column names.
• The statement must reference a base table.
• The statement must not reference tables with computed columns.
• The projected columns in the SELECT statement may not contain aggregate expressions unless the statement uses a GROUP BY expression. When a GROUP BY expression is provided, the select list may contain the aggregate functions COUNT_BIG() or SUM(). However, SUM() may not be specified for a nullable column. The statement may not specify HAVING, CUBE, or ROLLUP.
• A projected column in the SELECT statement that is used as a simple expression must not appear more than once.
• The statement must not include PIVOT or UNPIVOT operators.
• The statement must not include the UNION, INTERSECT, or EXCEPT operators.
• The statement must not reference a view.
• The statement must not contain any of the following: DISTINCT, COMPUTE or COMPUTE BY, or INTO.
• The statement must not reference server global variables (@@variable_name).
• The statement must not reference derived tables, temporary tables, or table variables.
• The statement must not reference tables or views from other databases or servers.
• The statement must not contain subqueries, outer joins, or self-joins.
• The statement must not reference the large object types: text, ntext, and image.
• The statement must not use the CONTAINS or FREETEXT full-text predicates.
• The statement must not use rowset functions, including OPENROWSET and OPENQUERY.
• The statement must not use any of the following aggregate functions: AVG, COUNT(*), MAX, MIN, STDEV, STDEVP, VAR, or VARP.
• The statement must not use any nondeterministic functions, including ranking and windowing functions.
• The statement must not contain user-defined aggregates.
• The statement must not reference system tables or views, including catalog views and dynamic management views.
• The statement must not include FOR BROWSE information.
• The statement must not reference a queue.
• The statement must not contain conditional statements that cannot change and cannot return results (for example, WHERE 1=0).
• The statement can not specify READPAST locking hint.
• The statement must not reference any Service Broker QUEUE.
• The statement must not reference synonyms.
• The statement must not have comparison or expression based on double/real data types.
• The statement must not use the TOP expression.

Additional reference(s):

• Working with Query Notifications

Answer 2

Another big issue I have with this technology: the need for the subscriber connection to have Create Procedure permissions. The web service layer of my application at work at the moment runs as a restricted user. To get notifications setup using SQLDependency I'd have to open up that user to create procs. Sounds like a pretty good step along the path of getting owned.

Answer 3

In addition to this, for anyone else thinking about using SqlDependency to receive notifications about changes, I've been using this approach in production, and I'm finding problems with it. I'm looking into it to see if the problems are related to my code, but the main issues are:

• If you fire multiple changes in quick succession, you don't always get the equivalent number of events coming through to the code. In my code, if 2 new records are inserted one after the other, I only get the one notification (for the last one).

• There is no way to know the record that was added. So if you add a new record, and the code fires to receive the notification, there is no way in the code to know the id of that new record, so you need to query the database for it.

Answer 4

To overcome these limitations, you can try use the SqlTableDependency. Have a look at www.sqltabledependency.it

Answer 5

Note that you cannot use a nolock hint in the stored procedure or the the dependency will remain constantly invalid and therefore any cache you make on it will permanently re-query the database.

with (NOLOCK) 

This does not appear to be mentioned in the documentation (as far as I can tell)

The following SET options are required prior to the procedure script

SET ANSI_NULLS ON
SET ANSI_PADDING ON  
SET ANSI_WARNINGS ON

Others have argued that these SET options are also required but I don't think they are. It's a good idea to set then like this anyway though.

SET CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL ON 
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON 
SET NUMERIC_ROUNDABORT OFF 
SET ARITHABORT ON

Answer 6

Spent a day chasing down an issue with SQL Service Broker not working, the root cause was referencing the database in the stored procedure.

For example, this select works fine in SQL Management Studio:

select [MyColumn] from [MyDatabase].[MySchema].[MyTable]

However, this is rejected by SQL Service Broker because we are referencing the database in the select statement, and the callback from SqlDependency comes back with Invalid in SqlNotificationEventArgs e, see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189308.aspx.

Altering the SQL passed into SqlDependency to the following statement eliminated the error:

select [MyColumn] from [MySchema].[MyTable]

Update

The example above is just one of many, many limitations to the SQL statement that SQL Service Broker depends on. For a complete list of limitations, see What are the limitations of SqlDependency.

The reason? The SQL statement that SQL Service Broker uses is converted, behind the scenes, into instructions to monitor the SQL Transaction Log for changes to the database. This monitoring is performed in the core of SQL Server, which makes it extremely fast when it comes to detecting changes to table(s). However, this speed comes at a cost: you can't use just any SQL statement, you must use one that can be converted into instructions to monitor the SQL Transaction Log.