I've got a main wpf window:
<Window x:Class="NorthwindInterface.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:ViewModels="clr-namespace:NorthwindInterface.ViewModels" Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<Window.DataContext>
<ViewModels:MainViewModel />
</Window.DataContext>
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Customers}">
</ListView>
</Window>
And the MainViewModel is this:
class MainViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged = delegate { };
public MainViewModel()
{
Console.WriteLine("test");
using (NorthwindEntities northwindEntities = new NorthwindEntities())
{
this.Customers = (from c in northwindEntities.Customers
select c).ToList();
}
}
public List<Customer> Customers { get;private set; }
Now the problem is that in designermode I can't see my MainViewModel, it highlights it saying that it can't create an instance of the MainViewModel. It is connecting to a database. That is why (when I comment the code the problem is solved).
But I don't want that. Any solutions on best practices around this?
And why does this work when working with MVVM:
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="MainViewModel"/> class.
/// </summary>
public MainViewModel()
{
// Just providing a default Uri to use here...
this.Uri = new Uri("http://www.microsoft.com/feeds/msdn/en-us/rss.xml");
this.LoadFeedCommand = new ActionCommand(() => this.Feed = Feed.Read(this.Uri), () => true);
this.LoadFeedCommand.Execute(null); // Provide default set of behavior
}
It even executes perfectly at design time.
What you could try is just setting the DataContext in the code behind and see if that resolves the issue. It is pretty much the exact same thing, but maybe your IDE is just playing up.
try this:
If you want to set the DataContext in XAML, you can use this at the top of your ViewModel ctor:
This will allow you to see the designer.
I have seen this error message when the
ViewModel
does not have a parameterless constructor.