PHP's pcntl_fork function is supposed to fork a process just as the standard fork function in C.
But I was wondering if this function really forks the process or if it emulates that behavior in a different way.
If it really forks the process then it's clear which process that is: one of Apache's child processes.
That's OK as long as Apache is using the prefork MPM (i.e. one process per request).
But what does happen if Apache is using the worker MPM??
When the worker MPM is being used, every Apache child process contains many threads, each one handling a different HTTP request. So if you would fork the process under that situation I can't even think what would happend to all those threads and requests being served.
So if pcntl_fork() really forks the process then I think it's not a good idea to use this function if you set Apache to use the worker MPM.
What do the experts say? Am I reasoning well, or I'm just speaking nonsense?
It's not a good idea to run PHP as a module on an Apache installation configured for worker MPM in the first place, because PHP is not threadsafe (I think that is stated somewhere in the PHP manual too).
It should fork the process, yes. The PHP manual even states that you should read
man fork(2)
for further instructions, so it's probably just a wrapper around the C fork function.Update: Here's the relevant page in the PHP manual for worker MPM: http://php.net/install.unix.apache2.php
I also found this page with some further instructions: http://www.stevekallestad.com/blog/apache_worker_mpm_with_php.html
I have just tried to use pcntl_fork via apache, the strange situation is that after fork a child process, the parent give the standard output(browser) to its child. So, you can image, the browser cann't receive the output from the parent process.
I'll try to be quick and concise,
Using "fork" through apache it is possible, you need to "install" then enable the functions in the php.ini, finally you need to add the extension in the apache directori (a symlink would have the job done as well) Ex:
On the other hand, I've been using forking for a lot of projects and it is really great at optimizing most of them, however, there is a bug when abusing of it with apache, im basically forking the forked child and doing anykind of hardcore stuff and it works... pretty good, but under load it works for some time before start to creating zombie process, i can manage the zombie process using "pcntl_signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN);" which basically will remove the process as soon as the child finish their task, this help a little bit, then is when apache goes crazy, and start threading itself and finally crashing your server, i cannot explain this behavior (yet, but i will) this weir/evil tree created by apache can only be seen from "ps" nor from server-status or apache logs, and i said evil tree because it basically creates hundred of process with children of children...
in nutshell:
Fork with apache will work? YES... absolutely
just dont abuse of it
hope this will help some one
pcntl_fork
probably works as you think it would : it forks the current process, the same way the C function fork does :But, quoting the Introduction of the Process Control section of the manual :
So, you should not actually use that function from a PHP script executed via Apache : it should only be used when your PHP script is executed from the command-line.
And, before starting to use that function, don't forget that :