I use jasmine runs and wait to test asynchronous operations. Everything works fine but I'm not quite sure what goes on behind the scenes.
The jasmine documentation states the following example to which I added three log statement.
describe("Asynchronous specs", function() {
var value, flag;
it("should support async execution of test preparation and exepectations", function() {
runs(function() {
flag = false;
value = 0;
setTimeout(function() {
flag = true;
}, 500);
});
waitsFor(function() {
value++;
if(flag) {
console.log("A");
}
return flag;
}, "The Value should be incremented", 750);
console.log("B");
runs(function() {
console.log("C");
expect(value).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
});
});
});
The first runs
and waitsFor
are perfectly clear to me. Runs
starts an asynchronous operation and waitsFor
waits for a condition.
However I do not understand why the second runs
does not start until the waitsFor
is finished. The waitsFor
is not a blocking call.
My guess is that waitsFor
implicitly blocks any following runs
call until it is finished. Is this so?
My evidence is that the console.log statements output:
B A C
But if waitsFor
would really block it should be
A B C
waitsFor
does block until the conditions it's waiting for are met or it times out.From the jasmine docs: "waitsFor() provides a better interface for pausing your spec until some other work has completed. Jasmine will wait until the provided function returns true before continuing with the next block.".
The linked docs also have a slightly clearer example or
waitsFor
.EDIT: Ah I see what you mean now.
waitsFor
won't block JS that isn't wrapped inruns
,waitsFor
, ect.What jasmine is doing is taking the function passed to it via
runs
orwaitsFor
and if jasmine is not currently waiting, it executes the function immediately. If it is waiting, it doesn't call it until it's finished waiting.That doesn't stop the
console.log
as it's been passed to jasmine so jasmine can't prevent it from being executed straight away.From the site: http://www.htmlgoodies.com/beyond/javascript/test-asynchronous-methods-using-the-jasmine-runs-and-waitfor-methods.html#fbid=mzNDUVfhFXg
Essentially, the runs() and waitsFor() functions stuff an array with their provided functions. The array is then processed by jamine wherein the functions are invoked sequentially. Those functions registered by runs() are expected to perform actual work while those registered by waitsFor() are expected to be 'latch' functions and will be polled (invoked) every 10ms until they return true or the optional registered timeout period expires. If the timeout period expires an error is reported using the optional registered error message; otherwise, the process continues with the next function in the array. Presumably, expects within the runs() can also trigger a failure report (and perhaps even in the latch functions themselves).
The documentation is particularly obtuse on these asynchronous features.
The solution is in the documentation: