I am trying to implement the RouteReuseStrategy
class. It works fine when I navigate to top level paths.
As soon as a path has child paths and I navigate to the child path, then navigate back to a top level path I receive the following error:
Error: Uncaught (in promise): Error: Cannot reattach ActivatedRouteSnapshot created from a different route
I have created a plunker to demonstrate the error. I see the plunker does not work in IE 11, please view it in the latest version of Chrome
Steps to reproduce the error:
You can view the error in the console:
I have tried the implementation found on this article
export class CustomReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {
handlers: {[key: string]: DetachedRouteHandle} = {};
shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
console.debug('CustomReuseStrategy:shouldDetach', route);
return true;
}
store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
console.debug('CustomReuseStrategy:store', route, handle);
this.handlers[route.routeConfig.path] = handle;
}
shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
console.debug('CustomReuseStrategy:shouldAttach', route);
return !!route.routeConfig && !!this.handlers[route.routeConfig.path];
}
retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle {
console.debug('CustomReuseStrategy:retrieve', route);
if (!route.routeConfig) return null;
return this.handlers[route.routeConfig.path];
}
shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
console.debug('CustomReuseStrategy:shouldReuseRoute', future, curr);
return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
}
}
And the implementation of this stackoverflow answer
/**
* reuse-strategy.ts
* by corbfon 1/6/17
*/
import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouteReuseStrategy, DetachedRouteHandle } from '@angular/router';
/** Interface for object which can store both:
* An ActivatedRouteSnapshot, which is useful for determining whether or not you should attach a route (see this.shouldAttach)
* A DetachedRouteHandle, which is offered up by this.retrieve, in the case that you do want to attach the stored route
*/
interface RouteStorageObject {
snapshot: ActivatedRouteSnapshot;
handle: DetachedRouteHandle;
}
export class CustomReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {
/**
* Object which will store RouteStorageObjects indexed by keys
* The keys will all be a path (as in route.routeConfig.path)
* This allows us to see if we've got a route stored for the requested path
*/
storedRoutes: { [key: string]: RouteStorageObject } = {};
/**
* Decides when the route should be stored
* If the route should be stored, I believe the boolean is indicating to a controller whether or not to fire this.store
* _When_ it is called though does not particularly matter, just know that this determines whether or not we store the route
* An idea of what to do here: check the route.routeConfig.path to see if it is a path you would like to store
* @param route This is, at least as I understand it, the route that the user is currently on, and we would like to know if we want to store it
* @returns boolean indicating that we want to (true) or do not want to (false) store that route
*/
shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
let detach: boolean = true;
console.log("detaching", route, "return: ", detach);
return detach;
}
/**
* Constructs object of type `RouteStorageObject` to store, and then stores it for later attachment
* @param route This is stored for later comparison to requested routes, see `this.shouldAttach`
* @param handle Later to be retrieved by this.retrieve, and offered up to whatever controller is using this class
*/
store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
let storedRoute: RouteStorageObject = {
snapshot: route,
handle: handle
};
console.log("store:", storedRoute, "into: ", this.storedRoutes);
// routes are stored by path - the key is the path name, and the handle is stored under it so that you can only ever have one object stored for a single path
this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path] = storedRoute;
}
/**
* Determines whether or not there is a stored route and, if there is, whether or not it should be rendered in place of requested route
* @param route The route the user requested
* @returns boolean indicating whether or not to render the stored route
*/
shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
// this will be true if the route has been stored before
let canAttach: boolean = !!route.routeConfig && !!this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path];
// this decides whether the route already stored should be rendered in place of the requested route, and is the return value
// at this point we already know that the paths match because the storedResults key is the route.routeConfig.path
// so, if the route.params and route.queryParams also match, then we should reuse the component
if (canAttach) {
let willAttach: boolean = true;
console.log("param comparison:");
console.log(this.compareObjects(route.params, this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot.params));
console.log("query param comparison");
console.log(this.compareObjects(route.queryParams, this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot.queryParams));
let paramsMatch: boolean = this.compareObjects(route.params, this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot.params);
let queryParamsMatch: boolean = this.compareObjects(route.queryParams, this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot.queryParams);
console.log("deciding to attach...", route, "does it match?", this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot, "return: ", paramsMatch && queryParamsMatch);
return paramsMatch && queryParamsMatch;
} else {
return false;
}
}
/**
* Finds the locally stored instance of the requested route, if it exists, and returns it
* @param route New route the user has requested
* @returns DetachedRouteHandle object which can be used to render the component
*/
retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle {
// return null if the path does not have a routerConfig OR if there is no stored route for that routerConfig
if (!route.routeConfig || !this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path]) return null;
console.log("retrieving", "return: ", this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path]);
/** returns handle when the route.routeConfig.path is already stored */
return this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].handle;
}
/**
* Determines whether or not the current route should be reused
* @param future The route the user is going to, as triggered by the router
* @param curr The route the user is currently on
* @returns boolean basically indicating true if the user intends to leave the current route
*/
shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
console.log("deciding to reuse", "future", future.routeConfig, "current", curr.routeConfig, "return: ", future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig);
return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
}
/**
* This nasty bugger finds out whether the objects are _traditionally_ equal to each other, like you might assume someone else would have put this function in vanilla JS already
* One thing to note is that it uses coercive comparison (==) on properties which both objects have, not strict comparison (===)
* @param base The base object which you would like to compare another object to
* @param compare The object to compare to base
* @returns boolean indicating whether or not the objects have all the same properties and those properties are ==
*/
private compareObjects(base: any, compare: any): boolean {
// loop through all properties in base object
for (let baseProperty in base) {
// determine if comparrison object has that property, if not: return false
if (compare.hasOwnProperty(baseProperty)) {
switch (typeof base[baseProperty]) {
// if one is object and other is not: return false
// if they are both objects, recursively call this comparison function
case 'object':
if (typeof compare[baseProperty] !== 'object' || !this.compareObjects(base[baseProperty], compare[baseProperty])) { return false; } break;
// if one is function and other is not: return false
// if both are functions, compare function.toString() results
case 'function':
if (typeof compare[baseProperty] !== 'function' || base[baseProperty].toString() !== compare[baseProperty].toString()) { return false; } break;
// otherwise, see if they are equal using coercive comparison
default:
if (base[baseProperty] != compare[baseProperty]) { return false; }
}
} else {
return false;
}
}
// returns true only after false HAS NOT BEEN returned through all loops
return true;
}
}
Is RouteReuseStrategy
ready for child paths
? Or is there another way to get RouteReuseStrategy
working with paths that contain child paths
Angular router is unnecessarily complex and custom strategies continue this trend.
Your custom strategy uses
route.routerConfig.path
as a key for stored routes.It stores (overwrites) two different routes for the same path
person/:id
:/person/%23123456789%23/edit
/person/%23123456789%23/view
First time view route was stored, second time edit, when you open view again last stored route is edit, but view is expected.
This routes are not compatible according to router opinion, it checks nodes recursively and finds out that
routerConfig
forViewPersonComponent
is not the same asrouterConfig
forEditPersonComponent
, boom!So either
routerConfig.path
must not be used as a key or it is router design problem/limitation.I ran into a similar problem and modifying my unique key method solved it.
Previously I only built off the first child, now I just recursively build my key off all children. I did not write the routeToUrl function, I got it from an article I read on custom reuse strategies a while back and it is unmodified.
Here is a way to generate unique keys for routes in the strategy class. I had similar problem but once i started generating unique keys the problem disappeared:
More on that https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/13869#issuecomment-344403045
I added a workaround to never retrieve detached routes when on a route with loadChildren by modifying my retrieve function in the custom RouteReuseStrategy.
I'm not sure it is a perfect solution for all scenarios but in my case it works.