Python: How to peek into a pty object to avoid blo

2019-02-07 07:11发布

I am using pty to read non blocking the stdout of a process like this:

import os
import pty
import subprocess

master, slave = pty.openpty()

p = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout = slave)

stdout = os.fdopen(master)
while True:
    if p.poll() != None:
        break

    print stdout.readline() 

stdout.close()

Everything works fine except that the while-loop occasionally blocks. This is due to the fact that the line print stdout.readline() is waiting for something to be read from stdout. But if the program already terminated, my little script up there will hang forever.

My question is: Is there a way to peek into the stdout object and check if there is data available to be read? If this is not the case it should continue through the while-loop where it will discover that the process actually already terminated and break the loop.

2条回答
Explosion°爆炸
2楼-- · 2019-02-07 07:54

The select.poll() answer is very neat, but doesn't work on Windows. The following solution is an alternative. It doesn't allow you to peek stdout, but provides a non-blocking alternative to readline() and is based on this answer:

from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
from threading import Thread
def process_output(myprocess): #output-consuming thread
    nextline = None
    buf = ''
    while True:
        #--- extract line using read(1)
        out = myprocess.stdout.read(1)
        if out == '' and myprocess.poll() != None: break
        if out != '':
            buf += out
            if out == '\n':
                nextline = buf
                buf = ''
        if not nextline: continue
        line = nextline
        nextline = None

        #--- do whatever you want with line here
        print 'Line is:', line
    myprocess.stdout.close()

myprocess = Popen('myprogram.exe', stdout=PIPE) #output-producing process
p1 = Thread(target=process_output, args=(dcmpid,)) #output-consuming thread
p1.daemon = True
p1.start()

#--- do whatever here and then kill process and thread if needed
if myprocess.poll() == None: #kill process; will automatically stop thread
    myprocess.kill()
    myprocess.wait()
if p1 and p1.is_alive(): #wait for thread to finish
    p1.join()

Other solutions for non-blocking read have been proposed here, but did not work for me:

  1. Solutions that require readline (including the Queue based ones) always block. It is difficult (impossible?) to kill the thread that executes readline. It only gets killed when the process that created it finishes, but not when the output-producing process is killed.
  2. Mixing low-level fcntl with high-level readline calls may not work properly as anonnn has pointed out.
  3. Using select.poll() is neat, but doesn't work on Windows according to python docs.
  4. Using third-party libraries seems overkill for this task and adds additional dependencies.
查看更多
手持菜刀,她持情操
3楼-- · 2019-02-07 08:03

Yes, use the select module's poll:

import select
q = select.poll()
q.register(stdout,select.POLLIN)

and in the while use:

l = q.poll(0)
if not l:
    pass # no input
else:
    pass # there is some input
查看更多
登录 后发表回答