I have created a 'control' using jQuery and used jQuery.extend to assist in making it as OO as possible.
During the initialisation of my control I wire up various click events like so
jQuery('#available input',
this.controlDiv).bind('click', this, this.availableCategoryClick);
Notice that I am pasing 'this' as the data argument in the bind method. I do this so that I can get at data attached to the control instance rather from the element that fires the click event.
This works perfectly, however i suspect there is a better way
Having used Prototype in the past, I remember a bind syntax that allowed you to control what the value of 'this' was in the event.
What is the jQuery way?
HTML 5-compliant browsers provide a bind method on
Function.prototype
which is, probably the cleanest syntax and is not framework-dependent, though it is not built into IE until IE 9. (There is a polyfill for browsers without it, though.)Based on your example, you can use it like this:
(side note: the first
bind
in this statement is part of jQuery and has nothing to do withFunction.prototype.bind
)Or to use slightly more concise and up-to-date jQuery (and eliminate confusion from two different kinds of
bind
s):Seeing that functions changes scope, the most common way is to do it by hand, with something like
var self = this
.I like your way, in fact use a similar construction:
and the first line of this.onClick:
I like this way because then you get both the element clicked (as this) and the "this" object as self without having to use closures.
jQuery does not support binds and the preferred way is to use functions.
Because in Javascript, this.availableCategoryClick does not mean calling the availableCategoryClick function on this object, jQuery advise to use this preferred syntax:
OO concepts in Javascript are hard to understand, functionnal programming is often easier and more readable.
You can use
jQuery.proxy()
with anonymous function, just a little awkward that 'context' is the second parameter.I don't think jQuery has a built-in feature for that. But you could use a helper construct like the following:
This way, you can create dynamic 'wrapper functions' with createDelegate() that call the method with a given object as its 'this' scope.
Example: