What are the pros and cons of using MIT Scheme versus using DrScheme, in the context of trying to go through SICP (presumably simultaneously to watching some / all the MIT 6.001 videos)?
相关问题
- Generating powerset in one function, no explicit r
- What is fixed point?
- How to include another file of definitions in curr
- unfold function in scheme
- returns the first n of list
相关文章
- Does learning one Lisp help in learning the other?
- What is “3D syntax”?
- What is the definition of “natural recursion”?
- How do I define a sub environment in scheme?
- Why is it legal in a function definition to make s
- Sending HTTP POST in Racket
- How to split list into evenly sized chunks in Rack
- Difference between OOP and Functional Programming
DrRacket got me up and running in Scheme with little to no thought. I didn't really need to learn anything new in terms of the tools needed to work the language. Furthermore, you get access to tons of packages for the PLT/Racket environment. I installed Vi mode (http://planet.racket-lang.org/display.ss?package=vi.plt&owner=kazzmir) for DrRacket which made solving the SICP exercises a little less painless.
Here's a guide that spells out setting up DrRacket for SICP. It's really easy. http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-sicp/
This answer was originally posted in the question body.
Please feel free to edit below:
MIT Scheme
Pros:
Cons:
DrScheme
Pros:
Cons:
I switched from MIT Scheme to DrScheme specifically because I couldn't get a version of MIT that runs on 64-bit Windows. I run DrScheme with the Language "Module" selected to do the SICP exercises.