I've a following list:-
a = [(1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 1), (4, 3), (5, 3), (6, 3), (7, 7), (8, 7), (9, 7)]
which is a list of tuples. Elements inside a tuple are of the format (Id, ParentId)
Its root node whenever Id == ParentId
. The list can be in any order of tuples.
I want to generate the following dictionary using the above list of tuples,
output = [{
'id': 1,
'children': [{
{
'id': 3,
'children': [{
{
'id': 5
},
{
'id': 4
},
{
'id': 6
}
}]
},
{
'id': 2
}
}]
}, {
'id': 7,
'children': [{
{
'id': 9
},
{
'id': 8
}
}]
}]
ie (in terms of graphs- a forrest)
1 7
/ \ / \
2 3 8 9
/|\
4 5 6
My final output should be the dictionary given above.
I tried the following:-
The solution which I've tried is the following:-
# set the value of nested dictionary.
def set_nested(d, path, value):
reduce(lambda d, k: d.setdefault(k, {}), path[:-1], d)[path[-1]] = value
return d
# returns the path of any node in list format
def return_parent(list, child):
for tuple in list:
id, parent_id = tuple
if parent_id == id == child:
return [parent_id]
elif id == child:
return [child] + return_parent(list, parent_id)
paths = []
temp = {}
for i in a:
id, parent_id = i
temp[id] = {'id': id}
path = return_parent(a, id)[::-1]
paths.append(path) # List of path is created
d = {}
for path in paths:
for n, id in enumerate(path):
set_nested(d, path[:n + 1], temp[id]) # setting the value of nested dictionary.
print d
The output that I got is
{
'1': {
'3': {
'6': {
'id': '6'
},
'5': {
'id': '5'
},
'id': '3',
'4': {
'10': {
'id': '10'
},
'id': '4'
}
},
'2': {
'id': '2'
},
'id': '1'
},
'7': {
'9': {
'id': '9'
},
'8': {
'id': '8'
},
'id': '7'
}
}
I'm close to it, but not able to get the exact output. Also, is there any better better solution?
Here is a simpler approach. (Edited as I realized from Thomas answer that the nodes can be given in any order): Pass 1 creates the nodes (that is, adds them to the nodes dictionary), while Pass 2 then creates the parent<->children structure.
The following assumptions are made: No cycles (it is not clear what the expected output would be in such a case, pointed out by Garret R), no missing edges, no missing tree roots.
EDIT: Why does your solution not work as you expected?
Here's a hint regarding the top-level: The output you want to obtain is a list of trees. The variable you are dealing with (d), however, needs to be a dictionary, because in function set_nested you apply the setdefaults method to it.
To make this easier, let's define a simple relational object:
Next define how to relate a collection of Nodes with each other. We will use a dict to hold pointers to each individual Node:
Now, take your input data and relate it:
Finally, getting the output: there's a good chance you want to have the data rooted as a a list of unique trees, rather than as a dictionary -- but you can choose what you like.
yielding:
As required, this solution works regardless of the order of the nodes.