I have created a protocol that my classes need to implement, and then factored out some common functionality into a base class, so I did this:
@protocol MyProtocol
- (void) foo;
- (void) bar;
@end
@interface Base <MyProtocol>
@end
@interface Derived_1 : Base
@end
@interface Derived_2 : Base
@end
@implementation Base
- (void) foo{
//something foo
}
@end
@implementation Derived_1
- (void) bar{
//something bar 1
}
@end
@implementation Derived_2
- (void) bar{
//something bar 2
}
@end
In this way in my code I use a generic id<MyProtocol>.
The code works (as long as Base is not used directly) but the compiler chokes at the end of the implementation of Base with a warning:
Incomplete implementation of class Base
Is there a way to avoid this warning or, even better, a more proper way to obtain this partially implemented abstract base class behavior in Objc?
You could conceivably do something like this:
That way, you have an implementation, but by default it raises an exception. However, if a derived class accidentally calls
[super bar]
or does not overridebar
, then the exception won't be raised. If that's not what you want, you could just shorten it to:In which case, an exception will be raised, even if a subclass calls
[super bar]
or does not overridebar
.In your protocol definition, you need to declare your methods under the
@optional
keyword.Your code should look like this:
See this question on SO.
I do something like this
In Obj-C, there is no concept of abstract class. So that, you can not let your Base class to be abstract (which means dont' implements all methods in the protocol). You can only have 2 choices. Let the method in protocol to be optionol and then implements it yourself in the derived class. Or, force all classes in the hierarchy to implement it, but let the caller to be careful not call the incorrect method ones