Recursive feature elimination on Random Forest usi

Question

I'm trying to preform recursive feature elimination using scikit-learn and a random forest classifier, with OOB ROC as the method of scoring each subset created during the recursive process.

However, when I try to use the RFECV method, I get an error saying AttributeError: 'RandomForestClassifier' object has no attribute 'coef_'

Random Forests don't have coefficients per se, but they do have rankings by Gini score. So, I'm wondering how to get arround this problem.

Please note that I want to use a method that will explicitly tell me what features from my pandas DataFrame were selected in the optimal grouping as I am using recursive feature selection to try to minimize the amount of data I will input into the final classifier.

Here's some example code:

from sklearn import datasets
import pandas as pd
from pandas import Series
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.feature_selection import RFECV

iris = datasets.load_iris()
x=pd.DataFrame(iris.data, columns=['var1','var2','var3', 'var4'])
y=pd.Series(iris.target, name='target')
rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=500, min_samples_leaf=5, n_jobs=-1)
rfecv = RFECV(estimator=rf, step=1, cv=10, scoring='ROC', verbose=2)
selector=rfecv.fit(x, y)

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/Users/bbalin/anaconda/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sklearn/feature_selection/rfe.py", line 336, in fit
    ranking_ = rfe.fit(X_train, y_train).ranking_
  File "/Users/bbalin/anaconda/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sklearn/feature_selection/rfe.py", line 148, in fit
    if estimator.coef_.ndim > 1:
AttributeError: 'RandomForestClassifier' object has no attribute 'coef_'

Answer 1

Here's what I ginned up. It's a pretty simple solution, and relies on a custom accuracy metric (called weightedAccuracy) since I'm classifying a highly unbalanced dataset. But, it should be easily made more extensible if desired.

from sklearn import datasets
import pandas
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn import cross_validation
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix


def get_enhanced_confusion_matrix(actuals, predictions, labels):
    """"enhances confusion_matrix by adding sensivity and specificity metrics"""
    cm = confusion_matrix(actuals, predictions, labels = labels)
    sensitivity = float(cm[1][1]) / float(cm[1][0]+cm[1][1])
    specificity = float(cm[0][0]) / float(cm[0][0]+cm[0][1])
    weightedAccuracy = (sensitivity * 0.9) + (specificity * 0.1)
    return cm, sensitivity, specificity, weightedAccuracy

iris = datasets.load_iris()
x=pandas.DataFrame(iris.data, columns=['var1','var2','var3', 'var4'])
y=pandas.Series(iris.target, name='target')

response, _  = pandas.factorize(y)

xTrain, xTest, yTrain, yTest = cross_validation.train_test_split(x, response, test_size = .25, random_state = 36583)
print "building the first forest"
rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators = 500, min_samples_split = 2, n_jobs = -1, verbose = 1)
rf.fit(xTrain, yTrain)
importances = pandas.DataFrame({'name':x.columns,'imp':rf.feature_importances_
                                }).sort(['imp'], ascending = False).reset_index(drop = True)

cm, sensitivity, specificity, weightedAccuracy = get_enhanced_confusion_matrix(yTest, rf.predict(xTest), [0,1])
numFeatures = len(x.columns)

rfeMatrix = pandas.DataFrame({'numFeatures':[numFeatures], 
                              'weightedAccuracy':[weightedAccuracy], 
                              'sensitivity':[sensitivity], 
                              'specificity':[specificity]})

print "running RFE on  %d features"%numFeatures

for i in range(1,numFeatures,1):
    varsUsed = importances['name'][0:i]
    print "now using %d of %s features"%(len(varsUsed), numFeatures)
    xTrain, xTest, yTrain, yTest = cross_validation.train_test_split(x[varsUsed], response, test_size = .25)
    rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators = 500, min_samples_split = 2,
                                n_jobs = -1, verbose = 1)
    rf.fit(xTrain, yTrain)
    cm, sensitivity, specificity, weightedAccuracy = get_enhanced_confusion_matrix(yTest, rf.predict(xTest), [0,1])
    print("\n"+str(cm))
    print('the sensitivity is %d percent'%(sensitivity * 100))
    print('the specificity is %d percent'%(specificity * 100))
    print('the weighted accuracy is %d percent'%(weightedAccuracy * 100))
    rfeMatrix = rfeMatrix.append(
                                pandas.DataFrame({'numFeatures':[len(varsUsed)], 
                                'weightedAccuracy':[weightedAccuracy], 
                                'sensitivity':[sensitivity], 
                                'specificity':[specificity]}), ignore_index = True)    
print("\n"+str(rfeMatrix))    
maxAccuracy = rfeMatrix.weightedAccuracy.max()
maxAccuracyFeatures = min(rfeMatrix.numFeatures[rfeMatrix.weightedAccuracy == maxAccuracy])
featuresUsed = importances['name'][0:maxAccuracyFeatures].tolist()

print "the final features used are %s"%featuresUsed

Answer 2

Here's what I've done to adapt RandomForestClassifier to work with RFECV:

class RandomForestClassifierWithCoef(RandomForestClassifier):
    def fit(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(RandomForestClassifierWithCoef, self).fit(*args, **kwargs)
        self.coef_ = self.feature_importances_

Just using this class does the trick if you use 'accuracy' or 'f1' score. For 'roc_auc', RFECV complains that multiclass format is not supported. Changing it to two-class classification with the code below, the 'roc_auc' scoring works. (Using Python 3.4.1 and scikit-learn 0.15.1)

y=(pd.Series(iris.target, name='target')==2).astype(int)

Plugging into your code:

from sklearn import datasets
import pandas as pd
from pandas import Series
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.feature_selection import RFECV

class RandomForestClassifierWithCoef(RandomForestClassifier):
    def fit(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(RandomForestClassifierWithCoef, self).fit(*args, **kwargs)
        self.coef_ = self.feature_importances_

iris = datasets.load_iris()
x=pd.DataFrame(iris.data, columns=['var1','var2','var3', 'var4'])
y=(pd.Series(iris.target, name='target')==2).astype(int)
rf = RandomForestClassifierWithCoef(n_estimators=500, min_samples_leaf=5, n_jobs=-1)
rfecv = RFECV(estimator=rf, step=1, cv=2, scoring='roc_auc', verbose=2)
selector=rfecv.fit(x, y)

Answer 3

This is my code, I've tidied it up a bit to make it relevant to your task:

features_to_use = fea_cols #  this is a list of features
# empty dataframe
trim_5_df = DataFrame(columns=features_to_use)
run=1
# this will remove the 5 worst features determined by their feature importance computed by the RF classifier
while len(features_to_use)>6:
    print('number of features:%d' % (len(features_to_use)))
    # build the classifier
    clf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=1000, random_state=0, n_jobs=-1)
    # train the classifier
    clf.fit(train[features_to_use], train['OpenStatusMod'].values)
    print('classifier score: %f\n' % clf.score(train[features_to_use], df['OpenStatusMod'].values))
    # predict the class and print the classification report, f1 micro, f1 macro score
    pred = clf.predict(test[features_to_use])
    print(classification_report(test['OpenStatusMod'].values, pred, target_names=status_labels))
    print('micro score: ')
    print(metrics.precision_recall_fscore_support(test['OpenStatusMod'].values, pred, average='micro'))
    print('macro score:\n')
    print(metrics.precision_recall_fscore_support(test['OpenStatusMod'].values, pred, average='macro'))
    # predict the class probabilities
    probs = clf.predict_proba(test[features_to_use])
    # rescale the priors
    new_probs = kf.cap_and_update_priors(priors, probs, private_priors, 0.001)
    # calculate logloss with the rescaled probabilities
    print('log loss: %f\n' % log_loss(test['OpenStatusMod'].values, new_probs))
    row={}
    if hasattr(clf, "feature_importances_"):
        # sort the features by importance
        sorted_idx = np.argsort(clf.feature_importances_)
        # reverse the order so it is descending
        sorted_idx = sorted_idx[::-1]
        # add to dataframe
        row['num_features'] = len(features_to_use)
        row['features_used'] = ','.join(features_to_use)
        # trim the worst 5
        sorted_idx = sorted_idx[: -5]
        # swap the features list with the trimmed features
        temp = features_to_use
        features_to_use=[]
        for feat in sorted_idx:
            features_to_use.append(temp[feat])
        # add the logloss performance
        row['logloss']=[log_loss(test['OpenStatusMod'].values, new_probs)]
    print('')
    # add the row to the dataframe
    trim_5_df = trim_5_df.append(DataFrame(row))
run +=1

So what I'm doing here is I have a list of features I want to train and then predict against, using the feature importances I then trim the worst 5 and repeat. During each run I add a row to record the prediction performance so that I can do some analysis later.

The original code was much bigger I had different classifiers and datasets I was analysing but I hope you get the picture from the above. The thing I noticed was that for random forest the number of features I removed on each run affected the performance so trimming by 1, 3 and 5 features at a time resulted in a different set of best features.

I found that using a GradientBoostingClassifer was more predictable and repeatable in the sense that the final set of best features agreed whether I trimmed 1 feature at a time or 3 or 5.

I hope I'm not teaching you to suck eggs here, you probably know more than me, but my approach to ablative anlaysis was to use a fast classifier to get a rough idea of the best sets of features, then use a better performing classifier, then start hyper parameter tuning, again doing coarse grain comaprisons and then fine grain once I get a feel of what the best params were.

Answer 4

I submitted a request to add coef_ so RandomForestClassifier may be used with RFECV. However, the change had already been made. This change will be in version 0.17.

https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/4945

You can pull the latest dev build if you want to use it now.