accessing “module scope” vars

2019-02-01 21:58发布

I'm currently learning Python, and I have to work on a Python 2.7 project.

Accessing "module scope" variables in functions of the module itself is a bit confusing for me, and I didn't succeed in finding a satisfying way.

My attempts so far:

Way 1:

my_module.py

my_global_var = None

def my_func():
    global my_global_var
    my_global_var = 'something_else'

Here I think that confusing local and "module scope" vars may be quite easy.

Way 2:

my_module.py

import my_module

my_global_var = None

def my_func():
    my_module.my_global_var = 'something_else'

Here, the name of "my_module" could not be as easily changed as "way 1" when necessary. Plus, importing a module into itself sounds quite weird.

What would you recommend? Or would you suggest something else? Thanks.

4条回答
狗以群分
2楼-- · 2019-02-01 22:35

Importing a module within itself can have unwanted side effects (like evaluating statements more than once.) I would suggest using "Way 1" and a tool like pylint to help verify your code and enforce common practices.

PyLint can be found at: http://www.logilab.org/project/pylint

查看更多
可以哭但决不认输i
3楼-- · 2019-02-01 22:36

Way 1 is the correct way when you absolutely must rebind a global variable. However you should ask yourself why you are modifying a global and whether there is something better you can do (such as encapsulating the behaviour in a class).

Importing a module into itself should be avoided as it is error prone. If the module is also a script you would sometimes need to import __main__ instead, or if the module is part of a package maybe you should be importing foo.my_module. In short, don't do that.

查看更多
Emotional °昔
4楼-- · 2019-02-01 22:45

Avoid setting globals at all. You can create new namespaces with classes quite easily, so use class variables if you must.

For anything serious you need a proper design with classes anyways.

查看更多
霸刀☆藐视天下
5楼-- · 2019-02-01 22:53

You probably want to read up on Python's namespaces. Way 1 is correct but generally unnecessary, never use 2. An easier approach is to just use a dict (or class or some other object):

my_globals = {'var': None}

def my_func():
    my_globals['var'] = 'something else'

Assignments always go into the innermost scope and the innermost scope is always searched first, thus the need for the global keyword. In this case you aren't assigning to a name, so it's unnecessary.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答