I've come across a interesting scenario (at least for me) in a stored procedure. Would like to have experts opinion and thoughts on it.
DECLARE @loopcounter INT
SET @loopcounter=10
WHILE @loopcounter > 0
BEGIN
DECLARE @insidevalue int
IF (@loopcounter%2 = 0)
SET @insidevalue = @loopcounter
PRINT 'Value_' + CAST(@insidevalue AS NVARCHAR) + '_'
SET @loopcounter = @loopcounter - 1
END
I was expecting this block will give the output as below
Value_10_ Value_ _ Value_8_ Value_ _ Value_6_ Value_ _ Value_4_ Value_ _ Value_2_ Value_ _
Instead I got output as below:
Value_10_
Value_10_
Value_8_
Value_8_
Value_6_
Value_6_
Value_4_
Value_4_
Value_2_
Value_2_
I thought if I declare a variable inside a while block, then for every iteration it will reset the value to NULL or default value (from c# background).
If this is by design then my question is how does SQLServer treat 'DECLARE' statement for that variable inside while block? Does it ignore it as the variable is already in memory?
Can somebody please explain me this behavior?
From Transact-SQL Variables
The
DECLARE
is not in itself an executable statement. The variable declarations are all identified at compile time and the memory reserved for them in the execution context.If you use the 2008+ Declare and Set syntax. The Set part of the statement will occur every loop iteration however.
In T-SQL a
WHILE..END
is not individually scoped, you can for exampleSELECT @insidevalue
after theWHILE
'sEND
.From Declare:
There are no more "local" scoping rules in T-SQL. It also means that you can't declare the same variable name inside IF and ELSE blocks.
All Declare does is declare a variable. It has no relation to assignment. The value of any variable that has never been assigned to is
NULL
. But thereafter, the only way the variables value will becomeNULL
again is through an explicit assignment.If you need it to be
NULL
at the top of each loop iteration, therefore, you must explicitly assign it.The variable scope is the whole batch in this case a stored procedure.
It isn't re-declared every loop
So this is exactly as expected
Edit:
There is a recent blog article which is quite similar. The author was quickly corrected :-)