I have always heard that C++ is not Object Oriented but rather "C with Classes". So, when I mentioned to an interviewer that C++ was not really object oriented, he asked me why I didn't consider it an OO language. I haven't done any C++ since University, and I didn't have much of an answer. Is C++ Object Oriented or not? and why?
相关问题
- how to define constructor for Python's new Nam
- Sorting 3 numbers without branching [closed]
- How to compile C++ code in GDB?
- Keeping track of variable instances
- Why does const allow implicit conversion of refere
相关文章
- 接口B继承接口A,但是又不添加新的方法。这样有什么意义吗?
- Class layout in C++: Why are members sometimes ord
- How to mock methods return object with deleted cop
- Which is the best way to multiply a large and spar
- C++ default constructor does not initialize pointe
- Selecting only the first few characters in a strin
- What exactly do pointers store? (C++)
- Converting glm::lookat matrix to quaternion and ba
Object-oriented programming (OOP) has become the preferrd programming approach by the software industries, as it offers a powerfull way to cope up with the cpmlexity of real world probleams. Among the OOP languages available today, c++ is far the most widely used language.
The languages should support several of the OOP concepts to claim that they are object oriented. depending on the fetures they support , they can be classified in to two categories.
Object-Based programming languages.
Object-Oriented programming languages.
Object-Based programming languages. if it supports
2.Object-Oriented programming languages.
It supports all object-based programming features along with two additional features
hence Object-Oriented programming languages means
Examples : C++, SMALLTALK,OBJECT PASCAL,JAVA
So , C++ is an OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE>
If you should still have some doubts in object oriented programming concepts refer the book of E.Balaguruswamy.
C++ is an object oriented language. The problem is that some language zealots have their own, sometimes conflicting definition of OOP. For example, some Java people say that C++ is not an OOP language because you can define functions outside of a class.
Just ignore them.
As other have said, C++ is not a PURE OO language. Then again, the only Pure OO language I know is smalltalk. The only pure functional language I know is the Lambda Calculus. I don't know ANY pure structured languages (They all have goto and/or multiple return statements)
Most people don't like writing in pure programming languages. It cramps their style.
The hallmarks of object-orientation are abstraction, encapsulation, polymorphism, and inheritance.
I'd say that C++ exhibits all four, so it qualifies as an object-oriented language.
It's possible write C++ as "a better C" and use a purely procedural style. Objects aren't mandated. Maybe that's what you're thinking.
The idea is that C++ is not just an object oriented language.
C++ is object oriented. c++ is c with classes is another way to say that c++ is c with oop added (and of course, there is more than that on top of c).