C++ member function virtual override and overload

2019-01-31 03:23发布

If I have a code like this:

struct A {
  virtual void f(int) {}
  virtual void f(void*) {}
};

struct B : public A {
  void f(int) {}
};

struct C : public B {
  void f(void*) {}
};


int main() {
  C c;
  c.f(1);

  return 0;
}

I get an error that says that I am trying to do an invalid conversion from int to void*. Why can't compiler figure out that he has to call B::f, since both functions are declared as virtual?


After reading jalf's answer I went and reduced it even further. This one does not work as well. Not very intuitive.

struct A {
  virtual void f(int) {}
};

struct B : public A {
  void f(void*) {}
};


int main() {
  B b;
  b.f(1);

  return 0;
}

3条回答
forever°为你锁心
2楼-- · 2019-01-31 03:43

The short answer is "because that's how overload resolution works in C++".

The compiler searches for functions F inside the C class, and if it finds any, it stops the search, and tries to pick a candidate among those. It only looks inside base classes if no matching functions were found in the derived class.

However, you can explicitly introduce the base class functions into the derived class' namespace:

struct C : public B {
  void f(void*) {}
  using B::f; // Add B's f function to C's namespace, allowing it to participate in overload resolution
};
查看更多
成全新的幸福
3楼-- · 2019-01-31 03:52

Or you could do this:

void main()
{
    A *a = new C();
    a->f(1);  //This will call f(int) from B(Polymorphism)
}
查看更多
混吃等死
4楼-- · 2019-01-31 03:58

Well I think first of all you did not understand what virtual mechanism or polymorhism. When the polymorphism is achieved only by using object pointers. I think you are new to c++. Without using object pointers then there is no meaning of polymorphism or virtual keyword use base class pointer and assign the desired derived class objects to it. Then call and try it.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答